Study | Country | Aim | Type of Study | Participants | Setting | Facilitators to Reporting/Recording | Barriers to Reporting/Recording | Quality Assessment |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bailey et al. 2017 [23] | England | N/A | Editorial | N/A | GP | REPORTING (i) Giving the YP the opportunity to talk about their SH in their own words (ii) Guided self-help information- Worked through with GPs rather than being given to the YP to read after a consultation RECORDING (i) Talking to YP about what is recorded and for staff to be trained to support consistency of recording | REPORTING (i) YP having poor intrapersonal and communication skills (ii) YP having concerns about whether shared information will stay confidential and/or negative consequences of disclosure (iii) YP struggle to explain SH and fear not being taken seriously or respectfully because of age (iv) Short appointments not comprehensive enough. (v) Ineffective screening tools- Screening tools too formal for time-limited consultations, yet need to assess risks, whilst not exacerbating current risk or cause the YP more distress RECORDING (i) Stigma of DSH due its connotations of blame and associated stigma | MEDIUM RISK |
Bellairs-Walsh et al. 2020 [57] | Australia | To explore YP's views and experiences related to the identification, assessment and care of suicidal behaviour and SH in primary care settings with GPs | Qualitative- Focus groups | Two focus groups with 10 YP | GP | REPORTING (i) Important to have a collaborative and ongoing dialogue (ii) YP want to be informed about sharing information to enhance feelings of comfort and safety. (iii) Language should be positive, inviting and warm. (iv) GPs should listen to YPs concerns, preferences and support them as an individual. (v) GPs displaying attentive body language, including eye contact and posture, and active listening. (vi) Rather than onus being on the YP, YP wanted GPs to initiate conversations | REPORTING (i) YP often had poor mental health literacy or felt hopeless or ‘like a burden’. (ii) YP described how failure by GPs to ask, could lead to missed opportunities. (iii) YP described fearing the consequences of disclosure, due to confidentiality and privacy of medical records and what may happen to information. (iv) YP viewed the language around risk as problematic, ‘negative’ and ‘intimidating'. (vi) An indifferent or impersonal attitude was seen as a barrier to honesty and disclosure. When risk-related assessments were a ‘tick-box’, formulaic manner, which could impact on the dynamics of the practitioner and patient relationship. This also hindered disclosure RECORDING (i) YP were worried about around what personal information was recorded | LOW RISK |
Fisher & Foster, 2016 [63] | England | To develop an evidence-based care plan/ pathway for children and YP in paediatric inpatient settings presenting with SH/ suicidal behaviour | Qualitative and Quantitative- Delphi survey | 5 junior and senior staff nurses | General Paediatric ward | REPORTING (i) Staff knowledge and understanding (ii) Being able to recognise behaviour when presented | REPORTING (i) Staff expressed need for further training due to suicidal behaviour being unpredictable (ii) Fear of making YP's difficulties worse. (iii) Negative perceptions of YP who SH- reported as disruptive, demanding, aggressive, and difficult to understand and communicate with. (iv) Difficult environment for disclosure- setting was busy, and chaotic with large workloads | LOW RISK |
Hawton et al., 2009 [47] | UK | To compare the characteristics of YP who reported deliberate SH episodes and presented at a hospital with those not attending hospital | Quantitative Question-naire | 6020 YP- 3186 males, 2810 females, 24 gender unknown) | Hospital | REPORTING (i) Previous Support- YP were more likely to present to hospital with DSH if they had sought help from parents, friends, or a psychologist/psychiatrist | REPORTING (i) Perceived severity of SH- Hospital presentation was rare following self-cutting, but more common after self-poisoning, other single methods of deliberate SH and multiple methods | LOW RISK |
Jennings & Evans, 2020 [56] | Wales | To explore the YP SH management and prevention practices, following reports that multi-agency teams were not effectively operating | Qualitative- Interviews and Focus Groups | Residential carers (n = 15) and foster carers (n = 15) | Foster carers talking about their experience of clinicians in Wales | REPORTING (i) Clinicians learnt from experience not knowledge (ii) Distinguishing RC role from clinicians- exchange knowledge to further own knowledge on the YP | REPORTING (i) Not an individual approach- Clinicians were reliant on abstracted knowledge and did not always have a direct encounter with a YP. (ii) Not understanding YP- Often situations were complex with wider factors. (iii) Clinicians not respecting carers- Clinicians as dominant and not seeing other views/experience (iv) Negative perception of YP in care | LOW RISK |
Miettinen et al. 2021 [62] | Finland | To describe experiences of help related to SH in YP | Qualitative Essays and Interviews | 27 YP aged between 12–22 who had harmed themselves during adolescence | Different social contexts, and with different backgrounds in relation to treatment in Finland | REPORTING (i) Access to range of professionals to talk to and have continuity of care once in the system | REPORTING- (i) Access to Help- Getting an appointment was slow. (ii) Threshold to seek help- YP required many GP visits and multiple referrals (iii) YP were uncertain about the severity of their SH (being taken seriously) and requesting help. (iv) YP were unwilling to burden loved ones and unwilling to get help (v) Consequences- YP were afraid of disclosing and not being taken seriously. (iv) Parents were often reluctant about a YP’s need for treatment RECORDING- (i) Avoidance- YP reported injuries were ignored, despite being asked. (ii) Not Recording- Professionals were unable to deal with SH and recording. Staff were reported as not reacting after having seen SH | LOW RISK |
Saini et al., 2021 [48] | England | To use Delphi methodology to reach consensus between different stakeholders and researchers on research priorities in suicide and SH to develop regional SH and suicide prevention and reduction schemes | Delphi Method | 88 conference attendees-clinicians, researchers, experts, police, third sector workers, commissioners and pharmacists | The Suicide and Self-harm Research North West (SSHARE NOW) conference | REPORTING (i) Training for those working with YP in non-medical settings, such as schools or community settings. (ii) Help-seeking- Understanding more about how and when YP seek help REPORTING and RECORDING (i) Services working together- The communication between different services and how they can work together can facilitate processes | REPORTING (i) Stigma. (ii) Lack of knowledge from organisational practices | MEDIUM RISK |
Tørmoen et al., 2014 [49] | Norway | To explore child and adolescent psychiatric services (CAPS) with both suicide attempts and non-suicidal SH, and to assess the psychosocial variables of YP | Quantitative Question-naire | 11,440 YP aged 14–17 years | 75 of 91 junior and senior high schools | REPORTING (i) Service Use- YP who reported SH were more likely to have used CAPS | REPORTING (i) A YP with a non-Western immigrant background was associated with a lower likelihood of accessing CAPS. (ii) In YP with both suicide attempts and NSSH, symptoms of depression, eating problems, and the use of illicit drugs were associated with a higher likelihood of CAPS contact | LOW RISK |