Skip to main content

Table 2 Univariate and multivariate regression models for associated factors of school bullying victimization

From: Resilience mediates parenting style associated school bullying victimization in Chinese children and adolescents

Covariates

Univariate model

Multivariate model 1

Multivariate model 2

Multivariate model 3

Multivariate model 4

OR (90% CI)

OR (95% CI)

OR (95% CI)

OR (95% CI)

OR (95% CI)

Age: + 1 year

0.81 (0.73, 0.90)

0.90 (0.79, 1.04)

0.89 (0.78, 1.03)

0.90 (0.77, 1.05)

0.91 (0.78, 1.06)

Sex (Ref: Boys): Girls

0.83 (0.70, 0.99)

0.90 (0.74, 1.09)

0.84 (0.68, 1.03)

0.86 (0.68, 1.09)

0.82 (0.65, 1.04)

Grade (Ref: Primary school)

 Junior high school or above

0.44 (0.30, 0.66)

0.61 (0.41, 0.90)

0.63 (0.42, 0.93)

0.60 (0.40, 0.91)

0.57 (0.37, 0.88)

Study style (Ref: Day students)

 Boarding students

0.63 (0.46, 0.86)

0.78 (0.59, 1.03)

0.78 (0.58, 1.05)

0.79 (0.57, 1.08)

0.79 (0.57, 1.10)

Marital status of the parents (Ref: Married)

 Divorced/Remarried/Widowed

1.73 (1.36, 2.20)

1.51 (1.17, 1.95)

1.53 (1.16, 2.01)

1.50 (1.13, 2.00)

1.48 (1.09, 2.01)

Income status (Ref: Stable): Unstable

1.41 (1.04, 1.91)

1.31 (0.97, 1.77)

1.31 (0.96, 1.78)

1.31 (0.94, 1.82)

1.30 (0.92, 1.83)

Father’s parenting style: + 5 points

 Rejection

2.01 (1.71, 2.36)

1.86 (1.59, 2.18)

 

1.28 (1.09, 1.52)

1.25 (1.05, 1.48)

 Emotional warmth

0.75 (0.66, 0.85)

0.80 (0.69, 0.93)

 

0.78 (0.59, 1.03)

0.83 (0.61, 1.14)

 Over-protection

1.18 (0.99, 1.40)

    

Mother’s parenting style: + 5 points

 Rejection

2.07 (1.70, 2.51)

 

1.85 (1.48, 2.31)

1.56 (1.19, 2.04)

1.46 (1.11, 1.93)

 Emotional warmth

0.79 (0.70, 0.88)

 

0.82 (0.73, 0.93)

1.02 (0.84, 1.24)

1.11 (0.96, 1.34)

 Over-protection

1.27 (1.10, 1.48)

 

1.10 (0.93, 1.30)

1.08 (0.91, 1.28)

1.05 (0.87, 1.26)

Resilience: + 5 points

0.86 (0.82, 0.90)

   

0.91 (0.85, 0.97)

  1. RSCA the Resilience Scale for Chinese Children and Adolescent