Skip to main content

Table 7 Final multivariable logistic regression model to assess predictors of an increase in experiencing or perpetrating intimate partner violence and abuse (IPVA) during COVID-19 restrictions

From: Experience and perpetration of intimate partner violence and abuse by gender of respondent and their current partner before and during COVID-19 restrictions in 2020: a cross-sectional study in 13 countries

Predictors

Any increase in experiencing IPVA (n = 2782)*

Any increase in perpetrating IPVA (n = 2725)†

OR (95% CI)

P value

OR (95% CI)

P value

Age

–

–

0.99 (0.98–1.00)

.033

Ethnicity

 Black/African American

0.19 (0.04, 0.89)

.035

  

 Asian

0.46 (0.09, 2.27)

.341

 Hispanic/Latino

1.03 (0.50, 2.12)

.935

 Mixed

0.99 (0.65, 1.50)

.944

 Other

0.75 (0.34, 1.65)

.481

 White (ref)

  

Kessler 6 Distress Scale total score

1.03 (1.01, 1.05)

.002

1.03 (1.01, 1.06)

.003

Relationship groups

 Women partnered w/women

  

0.77 (0.41, 1.43)

0.405

 Women partnered w/men

0.86 (0.72, 1.03)

0.106

 Men partnered w/men

0.88 (0.53, 1.44)

0.602

 Non-binary

1.60 (0.77, 3.30)

0.207

 Men partnered w/women (ref)

  

Currently living in your regular place of residence

 No, I relocated voluntarily due to the COVID-19

  

1.42 (0.97, 2.08)

.074

 No, I am stranded by the COVID-19 restrictions

  

1.94 (0.69, 5.51)

.211

 No, but this situation is unrelated to COVID-19

  

1.23 (0.70, 2.18)

.467

 Yes (ref)

    

Live with children

 Yes

1.05 (0.89, 1.25)

.560

1.12 (0.93, 1.34)

.243

 No (ref)

    

Area of residence

  Rural area

  

0.64 (0.42, 0.98)-

.038-

 Regional area

  

0.84 (0.69, 1.03)

.092

 Urban area (ref)

    

Amount of money left after expenses changed compared with before COVID-19

 I/we have more now

0.89 (0.71, 1.12)

.336

1.21 (0.98, 1.51)

.083

 I/we have less now

0.95 (0.78, 1.16)

.630

1.54 (1.26, 1.88)

<.001

 No change (ref)

    

Financial strain

 Very difficult

1.08 (0.64, 1.85)

.769

0.54 (0.29, 1.01)

.055

 Difficult

1.07 (0.71, 1.62)

.737

0.59 (0.40, 0.87)

.008

 Somewhat difficult

1.24 (0.97, 1.60)

.091

0.88 (0.68, 1.14)

.339

 Not very difficult (ref)

    

Coping with changes related to the pandemic

 Not coping well

1.98 (1.20, 3.26)

.008

2.11 (1.28, 3.48)

.003

 Coping somewhat well

1.70 (1.40, 2.06)

<.001

1.44 (1.19, 1.74)

<.001

 Coping really well (ref)

    

Relationship tension

 A lot of tension

6.78 (5.15, 8.93)

<.001

5.72 (4.36, 7.52)

<.001

 Some tension

1.96 (1.53, 2.49)

<.001

2.29 (1.82, 2.89)

<.001

 No tension (ref)

    

Change in alcohol consumption

 Only decreased

1.25 (0.98, 1.60)

.076

1.37 (1.06, 1.77)

.015

 Only increased

1.41 (1.14, 1.75)

.002

1.52 (1.22, 1.91)

<.001

 Increased and decreased

1.48 (1.04, 2.11)

.030

1.42 (1.00, 2.02)

.050

 No change (ref)

    
  1. Notes: OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence intervals
  2. *Ethnicity, K-6 total score, lives with children, area of residence, change in money left after expenses compared with before the COVID-19 restrictions, difficulty in paying for the very basics in the past month, difficulty coping with changes related to the pandemic, relationship tension in past 30 days and change in alcohol consumption were entered into the model to assess predictors of an increase in IPVA victimization during COVID-19 restrictions
  3. †Age, relationship group, K-6 total score, lives with children, area of residence, currently living in regular place of residence, change in money left after expenses compared with before the COVID-19 restrictions, difficulty in paying for the very basics in the past month, difficulty coping with changes related to the pandemic, relationship tension in past 30 days and change in alcohol consumption entered into the model assess predictors of an increase in IPVA perpetration during COVID-19 restrictions