Skip to main content
Fig. 1 | BMC Public Health

Fig. 1

From: Influence of previous experience with and beliefs regarding anal cancer screening on willingness to be screened among men living with HIV

Fig. 1

Correspondence analysis examining interrelationships between men’s beliefs regarding screening and willingness to undergo screening among men living with HIV attending HIV specialty care in 2016–2017 in the Ontario HIV Treatment Network Cohort Study (OCS) in Canada (large : strongly positive beliefs regarding anal cancer screening; small: positive beliefs; ✗: negative/neutral beliefs; arrows: willingness to be screened; squares: supplementary variables—past screening, sexual orientation, race)

Responses to belief statements labeled as: Doctor=“My doctor thinks that I should get an exam for anal cancer”; People=“In general, people who are important to me would encourage me to get an exam for anal cancer”; Know where=“I can find out where to go to get an exam for anal cancer”; Confident=“I am confident that I could get an exam for anal cancer in the next year, if I chose to”; Pain=“I will feel pain during the procedure”; Side Effects=“I have a high chance of getting unpleasant short- term side effects, like pain or bleeding, after the procedure”; Treatment=“If anal pre-cancer is found, I will be offered treatment”. Willingness as response to “Think about what you might do in the next year. If anal cancer screening were offered to you, would you get an exam where a doctor or nurse inserts a swab (like a long, thin Q-tip) into your anus (“anal Pap test”)”: “Very likely”, “Likely” and combined “Undecided”, “Don’t know”, “Unlikely” and “Very unlikely” as “Unlikely/Undecided”. Supplementary variables: sexual orientation (gay, bisexual, other men who have sex with men (MSM), heterosexual); ethno-racial identity (African/Caribbean/Black, Asian, Indigenous, Latin American, Multiple selected, white); past screening (Screened, Unscreened)

Back to article page