Skip to main content

Table 2 The effectiveness of primary and secondary outcome

From: Effectiveness of WeChat-group-based parental health education in preventing unintentional injuries among children aged 0–3: randomized controlled trial in Shanghai

Variable

Intervention group (n = 145)

control group (n = 131)

OR a or β b

P c

Baseline (95% CI)

Follow-up (95% CI)

Baseline (95% CI)

Follow-up (95% CI)

Unintentional injury occurrence rate, %

9.0 (4.1, 13.9)

11.7 (6.2, 17.2)

9.9 (4.8, 15.0)

22.9 (15.7, 30.1)

1.71 (1.02, 2.87)a

.04

First aid for tracheal foreign body, % d

70.3 (62.9, 77.8)

80.2 (73.3, 87.0)

.06

Injury attribution

3.46 (3.36, 3.55)

3.59 (3.50, 3.69)

3.49 (3.40, 3.58)

3.38 (3.26, 3.49)

0.091 (-0.028, 0.210)b

.13

Responsibility

6.60 (6.45, 6.76)

7.52 (7.40, 7.63)

6.80 (6.62, 6.98)

6.99 (6.82, 7.15)

0.165 (-0.014, 0.345)b

.07

Preventability

6.92 (6.75, 7.08)

7.72 (7.62, 7.81)

7.02 (6.83, 7.20)

6.94 (6.77, 7.11)

0.344 (0.152, 0.537)b

 < .001

Daily supervision behavior

16.99 (16.74, 17.24)

21.88 (21.58, 22.18)

17.12 (16.91, 17.33)

20.75 (19.92, 21.58)

0.503 (0.036, 0.970)b

.04

Behaviors of preventing specific injuries

30.99 (30.37, 31.60)

36.53 (36.16, 36.91)

31.10 (30.49, 31.71)

32.02 (31.44, 32.61)

2.198 (1.530, 2.865)b

 < .001

  1. Abbreviations: CI confidence interval, OR odds ratio. The statistical difference compared SKG and KG was argued by 95% CI whether contained “0”
  2. a The indicator is OR. For unintentional injury occurrence rate, we calculated OR, which equaled exp (β)
  3. b The indicator is β, non-standardized regression analysis parameter estimates adjusted according to child age
  4. c This section was analyzed by GEE model to state whether intervention had an impact on outcomes
  5. d This section was analyzed by Chi-squared test between intervention and control group for follow-up data