Authors | Publication date | List of judgement criteria for informatoin quality |
---|---|---|
Bovee et al [21] | 2003 | Integrity, accessibility, Interpretability, and Relevance |
Kahn et al [17] | 2002 | Accessibility, appropriate amount of information, believability, completeness, concise representation, consistent representation, ease of manipulation, free of error, interpretability, objectivity, relevancy, reputation, security, timeless, understandability, and value-added |
Sellitto & Brugess [5] | 2005 | Auhority and currency, accuracy, objectivity, and privacy |
Stvilia et al [22] | 2007, 2008 | Accuracy/validity, cohesiveness, complexity, semantic consistency, structural consistency, currency, informativeness, naturalness, precision, relevance, accessibility, security, and verifiablity |
Stvilia et al [23] | 2009 | Authoritative, complementarity, privacy, attribution, justifiability, transparency, financial disclosure, and advertising policy |
Emamjome et al [27] | 2013 | Completeness, originality, objectivity, novelty, accuracy, content quality, verifiability, reliability, amount of data, relevancy, credibility, user feedback, timeless, understandability, value-added, conciseness, consistency, and accessibility |
Weiskopf & Wen | 2013 | Completeness, correctness, concordance, plausibility, and currency |
Sun et al [25] | 2015 | Accuracy, specificity, objectivity, completeness, relevance, language expression, valuable words, novelty, understandability, profession, originality, external links, external certification, quickness, interactivity, effectiveness, and solution feasibility |
Choi & Shah [26] | 2016 | Responsiveness, alternativeness, completeness, emotional support, verifiability, and trustworthy |