Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: How users make judgements about the quality of online health information: a cross-sectional survey study

Original Submission
23 Mar 2022 Submitted Original manuscript
8 Apr 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
8 May 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
11 May 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
15 Jun 2022 Author responded Author comments - Huizhong Lin
Resubmission - Version 2
15 Jun 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 2
19 Jun 2022 Author responded Author comments - Huizhong Lin
Resubmission - Version 3
19 Jun 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 3
24 Sep 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
6 Oct 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
13 Oct 2022 Author responded Author comments - Huizhong Lin
Resubmission - Version 4
13 Oct 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 4
14 Oct 2022 Author responded Author comments - Huizhong Lin
Resubmission - Version 5
14 Oct 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 5
17 Oct 2022 Author responded Author comments - Huizhong Lin
Resubmission - Version 6
17 Oct 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 6
18 Oct 2022 Author responded Author comments - Huizhong Lin
Resubmission - Version 7
18 Oct 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
21 Oct 2022 Editorially accepted
1 Nov 2022 Article published 10.1186/s12889-022-14418-9

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page