Skip to main content

Table 4 Associations between lifestyle profiles and cognitive function (using standardised cognitive test scores, z-scores)

From: Associations between data-driven lifestyle profiles and cognitive function in the AusDiab study

  

Memory (CVLT), n = 4502

Processing speed (SDMT), n = 4511

Vocab & Verbal knowledge (STW), n = 4502

  

Unadjusted

β [95% CI]

Adjusted

β [95% CI]

Unadjusted

β [95% CI]

Adjusted

β [95% CI]

Unadjusted

β [95% CI]

Adjusted

β [95% CI]

Profile 1 (Reference Group)

Profile 2

0.06 [-0.01, 0.14]

0.06 [-0.01 0.14]

0.10 [0.03, 0.18] **

0.06 [0.00, 0.12]

0.03 [-0.05, 0.10]

-0.00 [-0.08, 0.07]

Profile 3

-0.06 [-0.19, 0.07]

-0.10 [-0.23, 0.03]

0.04 [-0.09, 0.18]

-0.08 [-0.19, 0.03]

-0.00 [-0.14, 0.13]

-0.15 [-0.29, -0.01] *

Profile 2 (Reference Group)

Profile 1

-0.06 [-0.14, 0.01]

-0.06 [-0.14, -0.01]

-0.10 [-0.18, -0.03] **

-0.06 [-0.12, -0.00]

-0.03 [-0.10, 0.05]

0.01 [-0.07, 0.08]

Profile 3

-0.12 [-0.27, 0.02]

-0.16 [-0.30, -0.02] *

-0.06 [-0.21, 0.09]

-0.14 [-0.26, -0.02] *

-0.03 [-0.18, 0.12]

-0.14 [-0.29, 0.00]

Profile 3 (Reference Group)

Profile 1

0.06 [-0.07, 0.19]

0.10 [-0.03, 0.23]

-0.04 [-0.18, 0.09]

0.08 [-0.03, 0.19]

0.00 [-0.13, 0.14]

0.15 [0.01, 0.29] *

Profile 2

0.12 [-0.02, 0.27]

0.16 [0.02, 0.30] *

0.06 [-0.09, 0.21]

0.14 [0.02, 0.26] *

0.03 [-0.12, 0.18]

0.14 [-0.00, 0.29]

  1. Profile 1 “Inactive, poor diet” (n = 3472), Profile 2 “Moderate activity, non-smokers” (n = 850), Profile 3 “Highly active, unhealthy drinkers” (n = 226)
  2. Adjusted models include age, sex, education and ethnicity
  3. β: standardised regression coefficient, CI: Confidence Interval, CVLT: California Verbal Learning Test, SDMT: Symbol-Digit Modalities Test, STW: Spot-the-word test
  4. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01