Table 3 Sample characteristics within each lifestyle profile (using final 3-profile model approach)a
From: Associations between data-driven lifestyle profiles and cognitive function in the AusDiab study
Profile 1 “Inactive, poor diet” n = 3472 (76.3%) | Profile 2 “Moderate activity, non-smokers” n = 850 (18.7%) | Profile 3 “Highly active, unhealthy drinkers” n = 226 (5.0%) | Comparison | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Female, n (%) | 2009 (57.9%) | 413 (48.6%) ^ | 93 (41.2%) ^* | χ2 (2): 43.02 | < 0.001 |
Age in years, mean (SD) | 60.9 (11.5) | 60.2 (10.5) | 59.7 (10.1) | F (2, 4545): 2.48 | 0.084 |
Highest level of education, n (%) | χ2 (4): 18.91 | 0.001 | |||
None, primary or some high school | 987 (33.1%) | 194 (27.0%) ^ | 47 (23.6%) ^ | ||
Completed high school, year 12 or equivalent | 676 (22.7%) | 166 (23.1%) ^ | 43 (21.6%) ^ | ||
Completed University, TAFE or equivalent | 1317 (44.2%) | 358 (49.9%) ^ | 109 (54.8%) ^ | ||
Income, n (%) | χ2 (4): 20.58 | < 0.001 | |||
<$49,999 | 938 (30.5%) | 195 (24.6%) ^ | 41 (19.6%) ^ | ||
$49,999 - $79,999 | 855 (27.8%) | 236 (29.8%) ^ | 61 (29.2%) ^ | ||
$80,000+ | 1284 (41.7%) | 361 (45.6%) ^ | 107 (51.2%) ^ | ||
Ethnicity | χ2 (2): 21.24 | < 0.001 | |||
Europid | 3152 (91.0%) | 799 (94.0%) ^ | 222 (98.2%) ^* | ||
Non-Europid | 313 (9.0%) | 51 (6.0%) ^ | 4 (1.8%) ^* | ||
BMI (kg/m 2 ), mean (SD) | 28.1 (5.4) | 26.9 (4.6) ^ | 25.8 (4.1%) ^* | F (2, 4540): 32.25 | < 0.0001 |
Hypertension, n (%) | 1531 (44.2%) | 299 (35.3%) ^ | 86 (38.1%) | χ2 (2): 23.87 | < 0.001 |
CVD, n (%) | 150 (4.6%) | 29 (3.5%) | 8 (3.7%) | χ2 (2): 1.84 | 0.399 |
Diabetes, n (%) | 147 (4.2%) | 23 (2.7%) ^ | 6 (2.7%) | χ2 (2): 5.24 | 0.073 |
CESD depression score, mean (SD) b | 4.3 (4.6) | 3.6 (4.0) ^ | 3.0 (3.8) ^ | F (2, 4434): 16.74 | < 0.0001 |