Author (Year) | N (% female), group characteristics, country | Mean age (years) ± SD (or range) | Study design and data collection (pre-post, follow-up) | School connectedness, depression and anxiety measures | Intervention description (Control condition) | Relevant findings |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Blossom et al. (2020) [41] | Intervention: 241 (61.8%),Control: 256 (64.5%), Youth with elevated depression, USA | Intervention at T1 T2: 3 months later (8th grade) T3: 9 months later T4: 12 months later T5: 1.5 yrs later (9th grade) | Randomised controlled trial: 5 waves; Baseline, 3-month follow-up (school attachment), 9-month follow up (self-esteem) and 18-month follow-up (outcomes) | School attachment (High School Questionnaire); Depression (Short Mood and Feelings Questionnaire) | HSTP: aimed to reduce risks of depressive symptoms among students transitioning to high school by increasing self-esteem and school attachment through providing them with social support (both at school and with caregivers) and promoting students’ participation in positive, school-based activities (A one-on-one standardized interview and clinical follow-up with a trained clinician, with a telephone call to parents to review concerns and to make recommendations for additional services as needed) | School attachment at T2 did not mediate the effects of the HSTP intervention on depressive symptoms at T5 (95% CI = 0.03 to 0.04). Sequential mediation model: HSTP intervention influenced school attachment at T2 which contributed to self-esteem at T3, which in turn contributed to lower depressive symptoms at T5 (95% CI = 0.02 to 0.0005). After accounting for self-esteem the direct effects of the intervention and T2 school attachment on T5 depressive symptoms were not significant (B = .02, p = .79). A second mediation model where the HSTP intervention predicted T3 school attachment, which predicted T4 self-esteem, which in turn predicted T5 depression was also significant (95% CI = 0.04 to 0.003) |
Singla et al. (2021) [42] | Intervention: 2854 (53%), Control: 2685 (52%), India | Intervention: 13.70 (95% CI = 13.67–13.73) Control: 13.71 (95% CI = 13.68–13.74) T2: 8 months later T3: 17 months later | Subset of larger randomised controlled trial: 3 waves; Baseline, 8-month follow-up, and 17-month follow-up | Relationship to school and school belongingness (subscales of Beyond Blue School Climate Questionnaire); Depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9) | SEHER: In addition to the information provided to the control arm, the intervention emphasized the importance of a positive school climate (supportive relationships between school community members, a sense of belonging to the school, a participative school environment) by identifying several areas for action (e.g., promoting social skills among adolescents) (Trained teacher in each school who conducted classroom-based sessions on life skills, including developmental changes, developing positive and responsible relationships, gender and sexuality, prevention of HIV and other sexually transmitted infections, and substance use) | Relationships at school 8 months post randomization mediated the association between the intervention and depressive symptoms 17 months post randomization (X- > M: standardized beta = 1.116 [0.20], M—> Y: standardized beta = -0.064 [0.017]). Indirect effect: -0.071 (-0.098 to 0.036). School belongingness 8 months post randomization did not mediate the relationship between intervention status and depressive symptoms 17 months post randomization (X- > M: standardized beta = 0.878 [0.22], M—> Y: standardized beta = 0.029 [0.016]); X- > M (effect of independent variable on mediator) M- > Y (effect of mediator on dependent variable) |