The COVID-19 pandemic’s intersectional impact on work life, home life and wellbeing: an exploratory mixed-methods analysis of Georgia women’s experiences during the pandemic

Table 3 Fit statistics and classification coefficients for latent class analysis ^a

	d	LL	BIC	SABIC	CAIC	AWE	BLRT p				cmP
1 Class	32	-6914.01	14021.54	13919.99	13944.06	13960.06	-	-	0.000	-	0.000
2 Classes	65	-6285.78	12964.64	12758.37	12807.27	12839.77	< 0.001	< 0.001	0.000	0.899	0.000
3 Classes	98	-6095.32	12783.29	12472.30	12546.02	12595.02	< 0.001	0.008	0.005	0.884	0.049
4 Classes	131	-5943.47	12678.68	12262.97	12361.99	12427.49	< 0.001	0.148	3.244	0.887	0.455
5 Classes	164	-5855.23	12702.22	12181.79	12305.18	12387.18	< 0.001	0.577	-	0.885	0.484
6 Classes	197	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
7 Classes	230	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-

Note. d = number of parameters; LL = log-likelihood; BIC = Bayesian Information Criterion; SABIC = Sample size adjusted BIC; CAIC = Consistent Akaike Information Criterion; AWE = Approximate Weight of Evidence Criterion; VLRM-LRT = Vuong-Lo-Mendell-Rubin adjusted likelihood ratio test; p = p-value; BF = Bayes Factor; cmP = correct model probability. Bold values indicate superior fit for each statistic
^a Based on a population of N = 423 individuals assigned female at birth; n = 3 identify as non-binary while the remainder identify as female

ISSN: 1471-2458