Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: “Everything the hujur tells is very educative but if I cannot apply those in my own life then there is no meaning”: a mixed-methods process evaluation of a smoke-free homes intervention in Bangladesh

Original Submission
11 Nov 2021 Submitted Original manuscript
15 Mar 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
23 Mar 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
27 May 2022 Author responded Author comments - Cath Jackson
Resubmission - Version 2
27 May 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 2
1 Jun 2022 Author responded Author comments - Cath Jackson
Resubmission - Version 3
1 Jun 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 3
1 Jul 2022 Author responded Author comments - Cath Jackson
Resubmission - Version 4
1 Jul 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 4
8 Jul 2022 Author responded Author comments - Cath Jackson
Resubmission - Version 5
8 Jul 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 5
25 Jul 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
30 Jul 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
8 Aug 2022 Author responded Author comments - Cath Jackson
Resubmission - Version 6
8 Aug 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 6
27 Aug 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
31 Aug 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
6 Sep 2022 Author responded Author comments - Cath Jackson
Resubmission - Version 7
6 Sep 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
20 Sep 2022 Editorially accepted
11 Oct 2022 Article published 10.1186/s12889-022-14283-6

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page