Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of development studies

From: Cardiovascular disease risk prediction models in the Chinese population- a systematic review and meta-analysis

Reference

Derivation model

Recruitment years

Median FU time / Prediction horizon

Study Settings

Derivation cohort size

Internal Validation cohort size/method

Age range

Predictors

Outcomes

Modeling Method

Model accessibility

C statistic (95% CI)

Calibration

external validation

Wang 2003 [17] a

10-year Risk model of CVD

1992 ~ 2002

6.1/10y

CMCS

31,728

No

35–64

Age, Gender, TC, SBP, HDL-C, smoking, FG

Fatal or nonfatal CVD

COX regression

Yes/Risk equations

Male 0.78 (0.76–0.81)

Female 0.76 (0.72–0.80)

NR

NO

Liu2004 [15]

CHD risk model

1992–1993

1996–1999

10/10y

CMCS

30,121

No

35–64

Age, Gender, TC, BP, HDL-C, smoking, DM

Fatal CHD

COX regression

Yes/Risk equations

Male 0.76 (0.70–0.82)

Female 0.74 (0.70–0.78)

Hosmer-Lemeshow test

NO

Zhang2005 [27]

10-year CVD risk prediction score

1974–1980

13.5/10y

Beijing

3000

1400/ random split-sample

18–74

Age, SBP, DBP, TC, BMI, smoking

Fatal or nonfatal CVD

COX regression

Yes/Risk equations

CHD events: training dataset 0.76/validation dataset 0.76;

IS events: training dataset 0.72/validation dataset 0.78

Hosmer– Lemeshow test

No

Wu 2006 [16]

10-year Risk prediction model of ICVD

1983–1984

15.1/10y

USA-PRC cohort

9903

No

35–59

Age, Gender, SBP,TC,BMI,smoking, DM

Fatal or nonfatal CVD

COX regression

Yes/Risk Sheet/ online calculator

Optimal model: male 0.80 (0.76–0.83)/female 0.79 (0.76–0.83)

simplified model: male 0.79 (0.76–0.83)/female 0.78 (0.75–0.82)

Hosmer– Lemeshow test

Yes

Yang 2016 [13]

China-PAR

1998

2000–2001

12.3/10y

InterASIA MUCA (1998)

21,320

21,320/10*10 cross-validation

35–74

Age, Gender, SBP/Rx, TC, HDL-C, smoking, DM, WC, GR, FHAC, Urbanization

Fatal or nonfatal CVD

COX regression

Yes/Online calculator

Male 0.79 (0.78–0.81)

Female 0.81 (0.79–0.82)

Hosmer– Lemeshow test and slope

Yes

Hu 2017 [29]

Cardiovascular death prediction model

1994

8.8/10y

Taiwan

381,963

No

20+

Age, Gender, BMI, smoking, physical activity, anemia, SBP, FG, TC, HDL, LDL, proteinrria, uric acid, CKD, CRP, heart rate, hypertension treatment

CVD death

COX regression

No

0.91 (0.90–0.92)

NR

No

Li 2017 [18] a

Risk prediction model of CVD

2004

3.09/5y

Shandong

50,990

21,853/10*10 cross-validation

20+

Age, Gender, BMI, DM, CKD, abnormal electrocardiogram, smoking, hypertension, dyslipidemia

Fatal or nonfatal CVD

COX regression

NO

Training dataset: male 0.84 (0.82–0.85)/Female 0.90 (0.88–0.91)

Validation dataset: male 0.84 (0.81–0.86)/female 0.89 (0.87–0.91)

NR

No

Pylypchuk 2018 [30]

PREDICT equations

2002

4.2/5y

New Zealand

401,752

166,611/geographical split-sample

30–74

Age, Gender, NZDep, smoking history, diabetes, SBP, TC/HDL, OBPLM

Fatal or nonfatal CVD

COX regression

Yes/Risk equations

Male 0.73 (0.72–0.73)

Female 0.73 (0.72–0.73)

Calibration slope

No

Li 2020 [31]

Risk prediction model of CVD

2004

10/10y

Taiwan

1481

740/bootstrap resampling

40+

Age, Gender, Marital status, BMI, smoking, physical activity, eGFR, ACR, history of heart disease, history of stroke, ABI

Fatal or nonfatal CVD

COX regression

NO

0.88 (0.83–0.93)

Hosmer– Lemeshow test

No

Yang 2020 [32]

CVD prediction model for high-risk CVD population

2014

3/3y

Zhejiang

19,953

9977/random split-sample

35+

Age, Gender, Family income, smoking, drinking, obesity, WC, TC, TG, LDL, FG, action capability, Self-care ability, Daily activity ability, pain, anxiety, History of hypertension/diabetes/dyslipidemia; Family history of hypertension/ischemic stroke and cerebral infarction; Hypoglycemic drugs use

CVD events

Random forest/CART/ multivariate regression/ NaïveBayes/ Bagged trees /Ada Boost

No

optimal model (random forest) from 6 models: Male 0.82/female 0.68

Hosmer– Lemeshow test

NO

Huang2021 [33]

GBCS prediction model

2003–2008

12/10y

China/Guangzhou

15,000

12,721/10*10 cross-validation

50+

Age, Gender, SBP, antihypertensive medication use, ever smoking, and diabetes status

Fatal or nonfatal CVD

COX regression

Yes/Risk equations

Training dataset: male 0.69 (0.67–0.71)/female 0.73 (0.71–0.74)

Validation dataset: male 0.67 (0.65–0.70)/female 0.72 (0.70–0.73)

NR

No

Wang 2015 [28]

CVD lifetime risk model

1992

18/lifetime

CMCS

21,953

No

35–84

SBP/DBP, non-HDL-C, HDL-C, BMI, Diabetes, Smoking

Fatal or nonfatal CVD

Kaplan-Meier method

Yes/Risk sheet

NR

NR

No

  1. CVD Cardiovascular disease, CMCS Chinese multi-provincial cohort study, TC Total cholesterol, SBP Systolic blood pressure, HDL-C High-density lipoprotein cholesterol, FG Fasting blood-glucose, NR Not reported, CHD Coronary heart disease, BP Blood pressure, DM Diabetes mellitus, DBP Diastolic blood pressure, BMI Body mass index, ICVD Ischemic cardiovascular disease, USA-PRC USA–People’s Republic of China, China-PAR Prediction for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in China, InterASIA International collaborative study of cardiovascular disease in Asia, MUCA China Multi-Center Collaborative Study of Cardiovascular Epidemiology, WC Waist circumference, GR Geographic region, FHAC Family history of ASCVD, LDL Low-density lipoprotein, CKD Chronic kidney disease, CRP C-reactive protein, eGFR Estimated Glomerular filtration rate, ACR Albumin-to-creatinine ratio, ABI Ankle– brachial index, TG Triglyceride, CART Classification and regression tree, NZDep New Zealand Index of Socioeconomic Deprivation, OBPLM On blood pressure-lowering medications, GBCS Guangzhou Biobank cohort study. a: Chinese article