Skip to main content

Table 2 Cost drivers

From: The economic burden of treating uncomplicated hypertension in Sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic literature review

 

Item (Reference)

Statistical test with value (p value or effect size), (BLR: bivariate linear regression, GLM: general linear model, CS: Chi square test, FE: Fisher’s exact test)

Positive Effect (higher costs)

• General Hospital [34]

• Hospital, Health Centers (HC) Level 3 [64]

• Private facilities [41]

• NRa

• NRa

• NRa

• Family size (4–6 people) [35]

• Family size (>6 people) [35]

• BLR (ß-Coefficient adjusted: 0.107 (0.044, 0.171), unadjusted: 0.122 (0.050, 0.195))

• BLR (ß-Coefficient adj.: 0.115 (0.044, 0.186), unadj.: 0.122 (0.050, 0.195))

Higher Distance from hospital [35]

BLR (ß-Coefficient adj.: 0.003 (0.002, 0.004), unadj.: 0.003 (0.002, 0.004))

Presence of a companion [35]

BLR (ß-Coefficient adj.: 0.096 (0.057, 0.135), unadj.: 0.106 (0.064, −0.149)

• Hypertension stage 2 [35]

• Higher number of antihypertensives or stage [41]

• Multidrug treatment [38]

• BLR (ß-Coefficient adj.: 0.070 (0.023, 0.118), unadj.: 0.074 (0.021, 0.126))

• NRa

• GLM (Exp(b) = 1.32, p < 0.001)

• Inpatient admission [37]

• Hospitalization [38]

• NRa

• GLM (Exp(b) = 1.87, p < 0.001)

• Highest Socioeconomic status (SES) [38]

• Higher income quintiles [59]

• GLM (Exp(b) = 1.4, p < 0.001)

• NRa

• Education college and above [38]

• Government employment [38]

• GLM (Exp(b) = 1.35, p = 0.016)

• GLM (Exp(b) = 1.30, p = 0.012)

• plus Comorbidity [38, 47, 54]

• plus diabetes [47, 53]

• plus heart disease [47]

• plus renal disease [47]

• GLM (Exp(b) = 1.20, p = 0.04), FE (34.940, p = <0.001), T test (2.899, p = 0.004)

• FE (8.879, p = 0.012), NRa

• FE (20.082, p = 0.001)

• FE (6.673, p = 0.030)

Sick visit (compared to average) [44]

NRa

• plus Insurance (total cost) [45]

• plus insurance (cardiovascular medication) [45]

• plus Insurance (Consultation) [45]

• CS (p < 0.0001)

• CS (p < 0.0001)

• CS (p = 0.018)

No effect

Age [35, 38, 54], gender [35, 38, 54], secondary / tertiary education [35, 38], marital status [35], residence (urban/rural) [35], stage (prehypertension to stage 1) [35], duration of illness [35], plus comorbidity [35], plus dyslipidemia [47], plus complications [38], occupation farmer [38], middle SES [38], income group [54], persistence to therapy [54], plus insurance (Transport, Chest x ray, Blood test, Echocardiography, other, non-cardiovascular medication) [45]

Negative effect (reduced costs)

• HC [34]

• HC level 2, level 4 [64]

• NRa• NRa

Primary education (vs no education) [35]

BLR (ß-Coefficient adj.: −0.072 (−0.0124, −0.020), unadj.: −0.068 (−0.126, −0.009))

Retirement [38]

GLM (Exp(b) = 0.71, p = 0.001)

Diagnostic visit, medicine collection, scheduled visit, inpatient admission (compared to average) [44]

NRa

Plus insurance (Electrocardiogram) [45]

CS (p = 0.001)

• Lower stage [54]

• Lower number of antihypertensives [54]

• Generic Ramipril (vs branded) [55]

• T-test (4.689, p < 0.001)

• T-test (21.313, p < 0.001)

• T-test (4.54, p = 0.005)

Controlled Hypertension [54]

T-test (2.618, p = 0.009)

% of household income spent on treatment <10% (compared to ≥10% spent) [54]

T-test (12.719, p < 0.001)

  1. aNR Not reported