Skip to main content

Table 4 Bivariate analyses using health risk behaviors cluster membership and covariates at T1

From: Changes in the clustering of health-related behaviors during the COVID-19 pandemic: examining predictors using latent transition analysis

 

Cluster 1 ‘Lower risk’ n = 814 (79)

Cluster 2 ‘Smokers and drinkers’ n = 14 (1)

Cluster 3 ‘Binge-drinkers and marijuana users’ n = 157 (15)

Cluster 4 ‘Smokers and binge-drinkers’ n = 52 (5)

n (%)

n (%)

n (%)

n (%)

Age**

  < =25

459 (80)

3 (1)

84 (15)

26 (4)

 26+

355 (76)

11 (2)

73 (16)

26 (6)

Gender

 Female

566 (79)

9 (1)

110 (15)

31 (4)

 Male

235 (77)

4 (1)

46 (15)

22 (7)

Loneliness

 Never/Rarely/Sometimes

487 (80)

8 (1)

83 (14)

34 (5)

 Frequently/Always

326 (77)

6 (1)

74 (17)

19 (4)

Perceived negative impact on economic or employment status**

 Not at all/A little/Some/

654 (80)

12 (1)

119 (15)

35 (4)

 Quite a bit/A lot

159 (73)

2 (1)

38 (18)

18 (8)

Perceived negative impact on personal relationships with family or friends

 Not at all/A little/Some/

586 (80)

9 (1)

101 (14)

35 (5)

 Quite a bit/A lot

227 (74)

5 (2)

56 (18)

18 (6)

Perceived negative impact on own or loved ones’ health

 Not at all/A little/Some/

665 (80)

10 (1)

121 (14)

39 (5)

 Quite a bit/A lot

148 (73)

4 (2)

36 (18)

14 (7)

Ethnic minority group

 No

667 (79)

14 (2)

122 (14)

44 (5)

 Yes

147 (77)

0

35 (18)

9 (5)

Region

 Northern region

170 (78)

2 (1)

37 (17)

10 (5)

 Southern region

532 (79)

10 (1)

105 (16)

30 (4)

 Another region

85 (77)

2 (2)

12 (11)

12 (11)

Depression Mean (SD)

7.00 (5.54)

6.75 (5.21)

8.13 (5.31)

8.56 (6.81)

Anxiety Mean (SD)*±

5.04 (5.20)

6.83 (8.02)

6.08 (5.15)

6.76 (6.11)

Stress Mean (SD)*±

7.86 (5.44)

7.33 (7.57)

9.26 (4.86)

9.16 (6.61)

  1. *p < 0.05 using one-way ANOVA
  2. ±p < 0.01 using Kruskal-Wallis
  3. **p < 0.01 using Fisher’s Exact test