HIV cascade: Healthcare facility-based | ||||
Cascade steps | Study | N | Proportion | 95% CI |
 Recruited of reached | No studies | - | - | - |
 Valid results of recruited | Rosenblum 2001 [38] | 139 | 100% | 97.3%,100% |
 Positive of valid results | Rosenblum 2001 [38] | 21 | 15.1% | 10.1%, 22% |
 Given results of positive | No studies | - | - |  |
 Referred to treatment of given results | No studies | - | - | - |
 Attended first treatment appointment of referred to treatment | No studies | - | - | - |
HIV cascade: Other service-based | ||||
Cascade steps | Study | N | Proportion | 95% CI |
 Recruited of reached | Anaya 2010 [22]; Bucher 2007 [28]; Grimley 2006 [21]; Magura 2000 [34] | 1825 | 71.6% | 67.5%, 75.4% |
 Valid results of recruited | Anaya 2010 [22]; Bucher 2007 [28]; Grimley 2006 [21]; Magura 2000 [34]; Page 2017 [35]; Stewart 2020 [41] | 2024 | 89.7% | 74.9%, 96.6% |
 Positive of valid results | Anaya 2010 [22]; Anaya 2015 [23]; Bowles 2008 [26]; Bucher 2007 [28]; Caton 2015 [29]; Gelberg 2012 [30]; Gelberg 2019 [14]; Grimley 2006 [21]; Magura 2000 [34]; Page 2017 [35]; Stewart 2020 [41] | 403 | 6.8% | 2.1%, 13.9% |
 Given results of positive | 7 | 81.2% | 43.3%, 100% | |
 Referred to treatment of given results | 6 | 92.5% | 46.9%, 100% | |
 Attended first treatment appointment of referred to treatment | Grimley 2006 [21] | 1 | 100% | 20.7%, 100% |
HIV cascade: Outreach | ||||
Cascade steps | Study | N | Proportion | 95% CI |
 Recruited of reached | No studies | - | - | - |
 Valid results of recruited | No studies | - | - | - |
 Positive of valid results | 5 | 0.8% | 0%, 3.8% | |
 Given results of positive | Tsu [42]2002 | 0 | - | - |
 Referred to treatment of given results | No studies | - | - | - |
 Attended first treatment appointment of referred to treatment | No studies | - | - | - |