Skip to main content

Table 5 Factors associated with ever had a Fecal Occult Blood Test (FOBT)/ Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT)

From: Identifying the factors promoting colorectal cancer screening uptake in Hong Kong using Andersen’s behavioural model of health services use

 

Ever had a FOBT/FIT

 

No (n = 739)

Yes (n = 578)

ORU

p-value

ORA (95% CI)

p-value

Predisposing factors

 Age (years)

63.8 (7.7)

66.1 (6.0)

1.61

< 0.001

1.34 (1.07–1.67)

0.010

 Sex

  Male (ref)

328 (61.8%)

203 (38.2%)

1

 

NR

 

  Female

411 (52.3%)

375 (47.7%)

1.47

0.001

  

 Marital status

  Never married (ref)

53 (52.0%)

49 (48.0%)

1

 

NR

 

  Previously married

77 (64.2%)

43 (35.8%)

0.60

0.067

  

  Married

609 (55.6%)

486 (44.4%)

0.86

0.478

  

 Educational level

  No formal education / primary (ref)

266 (56.0%)

209 (44.0%)

1

 

NE

 

  Secondary

341 (57.0%)

257 (43.0%)

0.96

0.737

  

  Post-secondary

71 (55.0%)

58 (45.0%)

1.04

0.845

  

  University

61 (53.0%)

54 (47.0%)

1.13

0.567

  

 Have a part-time/full-time job

  No (ref)

476 (51.1%)

455 (48.9%)

1

 

NR

 

  Yes

263 (68.1%)

123 (31.9%)

0.49

< 0.001

  

Health-related beliefs

 Perceived risk

2.37 (0.80)

2.44 (0.84)

1.10

0.168

NR

 

 Perceived severity

2.37 (0.69)

2.47 (0.63)

1.25

0.009

1.50 (1.15–1.96)

0.003

 Perceived benefits

3.79 (0.85)

4.13 (0.80)

1.69

< 0.001

1.44 (1.19–1.74)

< 0.001

 Perceived barriers

2.57 (0.55)

2.34 (0.52)

0.46

< 0.001

0.40 (0.29–0.54)

< 0.001

Enabling factors

 Monthly household income (HK$)

   < 10,000 (ref)

374 (51.4%)

353 (48.6%)

1

 

NR

 

  10,000 – 19,999

114 (60.0%)

76 (40.0%)

0.71

0.036

  

  20,000 – 29,999

93 (67.9%)

44 (32.1%)

0.50

< 0.001

  

   ≥ 30,000

158 (60.1%)

105 (39.9%)

0.70

0.016

  

 Have health insurance

  No (ref)

515 (57.0%)

389 (43.0%)

1

 

NE

 

  Yes

224 (54.2%)

189 (45.8%)

1.12

0.354

  

Health practice

 Have regular primary care service provider

  No (ref)

301 (66.9%)

149 (33.1%)

1

 

NR

 

  Yes

438 (50.5%)

429 (49.5%)

1.98

< 0.001

  

 CRC cancer screening accessible at your primary care service provider

  No (ref)

597 (64.3%)

331 (35.7%)

1

 

NR

 

  Yes

142 (36.5%)

247 (63.5%)

3.14

< 0.001

  

 Frequency of visiting a doctor in the past year

  0 (ref)

182 (72.8%)

68 (27.2%)

1

 

NR

 

  1–2

184 (55.8%)

146 (44.2%)

2.12

< 0.001

  

  3–4

189 (53.4%)

165 (46.6%)

2.34

< 0.001

  

   ≥ 5

184 (48.0%)

199 (52.0%)

2.90

< 0.001

  

 Had ever undergone other cancer screenings except CRC

  No (ref)

554 (61.0%)

354 (39.0%)

1

 

1

 

  Yes

185 (45.2%)

224 (54.8%)

1.90

< 0.001

1.97 (1.42–2.73)

< 0.001

Utilization of complementary therapies

 Use of acupuncture

  Not at all/ a little (ref)

609 (57.3%)

454 (42.7%)

1

 

NR

 

  Sometimes

89 (51.1%)

85 (48.9%)

1.28

0.131

  

  Often/ always

41 (51.2%)

39 (48.8%)

1.28

0.294

  

 Use of cupping

  Not at all/ a little (ref)

645 (56.0%)

507 (44.0%)

1

 

NE

 

  Sometimes

73 (59.3%)

50 (40.7%)

0.87

0.475

  

  Often/ always

21 (50.0%)

21 (50.0%)

1.27

0.444

  

 Use of Chinese herbal medicine

  Not at all/ a little (ref)

509 (57.4%)

377 (42.6%)

1

 

NE

 

  Sometimes

170 (53.1%)

150 (46.9%)

1.19

0.182

  

  Often/ always

60 (54.1%)

51 (45.9%)

1.15

0.496

  

 Use of bonesetting

  Not at all/ a little (ref)

638 (55.1%)

519 (44.9%)

1

 

NR

 

  Sometimes

82 (61.7%)

51 (38.3%)

0.77

0.153

  

  Often/ always

19 (70.4%)

8 (29.6%)

0.52

0.122

  

 Use of tuina (Chinese massage)

  Not at all/ a little (ref)

525 (53.4%)

458 (46.6%)

1

 

NR

 

  Sometimes

148 (63.8%)

84 (36.2%)

0.65

0.004

  

  Often/ always

66 (64.7%)

36 (35.3%)

0.63

0.030

  

CRC screening-related information acquisition:

 Do you know there is government subsidy from CRC screening programme

  No (ref)

198 (74.2%)

69 (25.8%)

1

 

NR

 

  Yes

541 (51.5%)

509 (48.5%)

2.70

< 0.001

  

 Had ever used the government subsidy for CRC screening

  No (ref)

691 (78.1%)

194 (21.9%)

1

 

1

 

  Yes

48 (11.1%)

384 (88.9%)

28.50

< 0.001

23.87 (16.48–34.56)

< 0.001

 Had ever received information about cancer prevention and screening from community centres

  No (ref)

637 (61.0%)

408 (39.0%)

1

 

NR

 

  Yes

102 (37.5%)

170 (62.5%)

2.60

< 0.001

  

 Had ever received information about cancer prevention and screening from media

  No (ref)

233 (66.0%)

120 (34.0%)

1

 

NR

 

  Yes

506 (52.5%)

458 (47.5%)

1.76

< 0.001

  

 Had ever received information about cancer prevention and screening from booklets

  No (ref)

626 (65.5%)

329 (34.5%)

1

 

1

 

  Yes

113 (31.2%)

249 (68.8%)

4.19

< 0.001

2.22 (1.56–3.16)

< 0.001

 Had ever received information about cancer prevention and screening from promotion video

  No (ref)

359 (65.2%)

192 (34.8%)

1

 

NR

 

  Yes

380 (49.6%)

386 (50.4%)

1.90

< 0.001

  

 Had ever received information about cancer prevention and screening from health talks

  No (ref)

651 (62.7%)

387 (37.3%)

1

 

NR

 

  Yes

88 (31.5%)

191 (68.5%)

3.65

< 0.001

  

Prompt to have a CRC screening

 Had ever prompted by doctor to have a CRC screening

  No (ref)

450 (58.7%)

317 (41.3%)

1

 

1

 

  Yes

289 (52.5%)

261 (47.5%)

1.28

0.027

1.46 (1.04–2.05)

0.029

 Had ever prompted by nurse to have a CRC screening

  No (ref)

646 (59.5%)

440 (40.5%)

1

 

NR

 

  Yes

93 (40.3%)

138 (59.7%)

2.18

< 0.001

  

 Had ever prompted by friend to have a CRC screening

  No (ref)

619 (60.2%)

410 (39.8%)

1

 

NR

 

  Yes

120 (41.7%)

168 (58.3%)

2.11

< 0.001

  

 Had ever prompted by family to have a CRC screening

  No (ref)

551 (59.7%)

372 (40.3%)

1

 

1

 

  Yes

188 (47.7%)

206 (52.3%)

1.62

< 0.001

1.70 (1.19–2.42)

0.004

Needs factors

 Family history of colorectal cancer

  No (ref)

650 (56.8%)

495 (43.2%)

1

 

NR

 

  Yes

89 (51.7%)

83 (48.3%)

1.23

0.216

  

Health status

 Perceived health status

  Excellent/very good (ref)

73 (49.3%)

75 (50.7%)

1

 

NR

 

  Good

313 (58.5%)

222 (41.5%)

0.69

0.047

  

  Fair

322 (57.3%)

240 (42.7%)

0.73

0.083

  

  Poor

31 (43.1%)

41 (56.9%)

1.29

0.383

  

 Number of chronic diseases

  None (ref)

365 (58.6%)

258 (41.4%)

1

 

NE

 

  1

211 (54.9%)

173 (45.1%)

1.16

0.257

  

  2

85 (51.2%)

81 (48.8%)

1.35

0.088

  

   ≥ 3

78 (54.2%)

66 (45.8%)

1.20

0.333

  

 Smoking status

  Never smoke (ref)

554 (52.2%)

507 (47.8%)

1

 

1

 

  Ex-smoker

101 (64.7%)

55 (35.3%)

0.60

0.004

0.76 (0.46–1.26)

0.291

  Current smoker

84 (84.0%)

16 (16.0%)

0.21

< 0.001

0.29 (0.14–0.61)

0.001

  1. Data marked with are presented as mean (standard deviation), all others are presented as frequency (row %)
  2. ref reference group of the categorical variable, ORU univariate odds ratio, ORA odds ratio adjusted for other significant factors obtained from backward multivariable logistic regression analysis using variables with p-value < 0.25 in univariate analysis as candidate variables, NE not entered into multivariable analysis, NR not retained in backward multivariable logistic regression
  3. Odds ratio for age was estimated per 10-year increment