Table 5 Correlation of local authority resources and individual factors with commuting physical activity

Year, reference 2000

0.66**

0.50–0.86

0.36***

0.25–0.51

 Park hectares/1000 inhabitants

1.01

0.95–1.07

1.01

0.96–1.07

 Km of ways for pedestrians and bicycles/1000 inhabitants

1.07

0.93–1.22

1.07

0.93–1.23

 NR of organisation receiving grants/1000 inhabitants

0.86

0.68–1.09

0.85

0.67–1.07

 € used for sport and outdoor recreation/inhabitant

1.00

1.00–1.00

1.00

1.00–1.01

 Semi-urban

0.64

0.39–1.05

0.71

0.44–1.15

 Rural

0.36***

0.20–0.66

0.38***

0.21–0.68

Age

1.06***

1.04–1.08

Gender, reference male

3.16***

2.36–4.16

 Training or technical certificate for courses completed

1.08

0.63–1.85

 Vocational school

0.86

0.52–1.41

 A technical college or special vocational qualification

0.67

0.40–1.12

 A degree of higher vocational qualification

0.69

0.37–1.27

 A higher university qualification

1.40

0.79–2.46

 Rather poor

0.69

0.09–5.40

 Moderate

0.91

0.13–6.42

 Rather good

1.25

0.18–8.73

 Good

1.21

0.17–8.43

Municipal-level variance (Standard Error)

0.505(0.168)

Individual-level variance (Standard Error)

4.070 (0.433)

Municipal-level intraclass correlation

0.133

Individual-level intraclass correlation

0.552

Number of observations

2788

Number of groups (individuals)

1394

Observation per group: minimum/average/maximum

2/2/2

Number of groups (municipalities)

110

Observation per group (per municipality): min/average/max

2/25.3/304

Wald chi2/Prob>chi2

Linear regression test vs. ologit regression

413.76***