Table 9 Association between TCB-victimizationa clusters and insomniab (n = 1,200)
| Â | Step 1 | Step 2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OR | (95% CI) | OR | (95% CI) | |
Female (ref. male) | 0.92 | (0.71–1.18) | 1.09 | (0.82–1.44) |
Age | 0.99 | (0.98–1.00) | 1.00 | (0.98–1.01) |
Cluster Y (ref. cluster X) | 4.92 | (3.30–7.35) | 3.33 | (2.18–5.07) |
Cluster Z (ref. cluster X) | 6.81 | (3.18–14.58) | 6.26 | (2.80–14.01) |
Not married (ref. married) |  |  | 0.73 | (0.55–0.96) |
Manager (ref. non-manager) |  |  | 1.49 | (1.06–2.10) |
Neuroticism |  |  | 1.19 | (1.12–1.26) |
Quantitative workload |  |  | 1.31 | (1.05–1.63) |
Qualitative workload |  |  | 1.48 | (1.18–1.87) |
Job control |  |  | 0.81 | (0.68–0.97) |
Organizational environment scale |  |  | 0.91 | (0.84–0.98) |
Gratitude for supportive work environment |  |  | 0.72 | (0.60–0.86) |
Nagelkerke R2 | 0.12 | 0.27 | ||