Lifestyle factors and psychological well-being: 10-year follow-up study in Lithuanian urban population

BMC Public Health

Table 4 OR of higher PWB over 10 years of follow-up according to protective health behaviour score^a

Protective health behaviour score (PHBS)	MEN				WOMEN
	Model 1		Model 2		Model 1		Model 2
	n = 1472				n = 1795
	OR	95% CI	OR	95% CI	OR	95% CI	OR	95% CI
0–2	1		1		1		1
3	1.53	1.08–2.18	1.27	0.87–1.84	1.52	0.85–2.72	1.20	0.63–2.26
4	2.47	1.76–3.47	1.98	1.38–2.85	2.22	1.27–3.89	1.41	0.76–2.61
5	3.36	2.31–4.89	2.55	1.72–3.79	3.36	1.92–5.89	1.85	1.00–3.42
6	3.09	1.60–6.00	2.09	1.03–4.22	4.44	2.30–8.56	2.19	1.07–4.49

Model 1 adjusted for age, biological factors (arterial hypertension, glucose level, triglycerides, HDL cholesterol and LDL cholesterol). Model 2 adjusted for all the variables in Model 1 plus socioeconomic, social, and socio-demographic factors (marital status, education, employment status, number of children, and membership of social organization), depressive symptoms and CHD
Bold typeface indicates significance
CHD coronary heart disease, CI confidence interval, HDL high density lipoprotein, LDL low density lipoprotein, OR odds ratio, PWB psychological well-being
^aprotective health behaviour score in the initial survey

ISSN: 1471-2458