Skip to main content

Table 1 Study characteristics and measurement of economic abuse

From: Examining the impact of economic abuse on survivors of intimate partner violence: a scoping review

Author (Publication year)

Study location

Sample

Nature of study

Measurement of economic abuse

Economic abuse prevalence rate

Adams & Beeble (2019) [20]

United States

Women receiving services from DV and SA service agencies

(n = 94)

Survey data collected as part of a larger, longitudinal evaluation of an advocacy intervention

SEA

(28 items)

Not reported

Adams et al. (2008) [2]

United States

Women receiving services from DV service agencies

(n = 103)

Cross-sectional survey focused on validating a measurement tool for EA

SEA

(28 items)

99%

(since relationship began)

Adams et al. (2015) [3]

United States

Women receiving services from DV and SA service agencies

(n = 93)

Survey data collected as part of a larger, longitudinal evaluation of an advocacy intervention

SEA

(28 items)

All reported some form of EA at baseline

(since relationship began)

Adams et al. (2020) [21]

United States

Women receiving services from DV service agencies

(n = 248)

Cross-sectional survey focused on validating a measurement tool for EA

SEA2

(14 items)

96%

(at least one EA tactic since relationship began)

Adams et al. (2020) [22]

United States

Women who called the National DV Hotline

(n = 1823)

Cross-sectional convenience sample using brief surveys

Three (3) items measuring coerced debt

52%

(lifetime coerced debt)

Antai et al. (2014) [23]

Philippines

Women between the ages of 15–49 living in Philippines

(n = 9316)

Cross-sectional representative sample using surveys

Four (4) items measuring EA

Not reported

Bulut et al. (2017) [24]

Turkey

Postpartum women receiving care in a family practice clinic

(n = 128)

Cross-sectional convenience sample using surveys

Not indicated

3%

(timeframe unclear)

Cardenas et al. (2021) [25]

United States

Latina women receiving services from DV agencies

(n = 200)

Survey data collected as part of a larger, longitudinal evaluation of a financial empowerment program

SEA-12

(12 items)

Not reported

Davila et al. (2021) [26]

United States

Latina women receiving services from DV agencies

(n = 245)

Cross-sectional study using data collected from a longitudinal evaluation of a financial empowerment program

SEA-12

(12 items)

Not reported

Gibbs et al. (2018) [27]

South Africa

Women aged 18–30 living in informal settlements

(n = 680)

Cross-sectional study using data collected from a longitudinal evaluation of a DV intervention

Four (4) items measuring EA

52%

(at least one EA tactic in past 12 months)

Gottlieb & Mahabir (2021) [28]

United States

Mothers interviewed in hospitals after giving birth

(n = 3515)

Secondary analysis of longitudinal data from the FFCWB Study

Two (2) items measuring financial control and work/school sabotage

One-third of sample

(since the birth of their child)

Gul et al. (2020) [29]

Turkey

Mothers of children referred for pediatric health services

(n = 336)

Cross-sectional convenience sample using surveys

One (1) item measuring EA

12.5%

(since relationship began)

Gurkan et al. (2020) [30]

Turkey

Pregnant women presenting to the antenatal polyclinic

(n = 370)

Cross-sectional convenience sample using surveys

One (1) item from DV Against Women Screening Form

25.9%

(during pregnancy)

Haj-Yahia (2000) [31]

Palestine

Married Palestinian women

(n = 1334)

Cross-sectional systematic random sample using surveys

Two (2) items measuring financial control

44%

(past 12 months)

Hamdan-Mansour et al. (2011) [32]

Jordan

Ever married women over the age of 18 living in villages in southern Jordan

(n = 807)

Cross-sectional study using stratified random sampling to survey participants

Marital Abuse Scale

(5 items)

Not reported

Huang et al. (2013) [33]

United States

Mothers interviewed in hospitals following giving birth

(n = 2107)

Secondary analysis of longitudinal data collected from the FFCWB Study

Two (2) items measuring financial control and work/school sabotage

11.8% at baseline; 13.5% at Year 3;

15.1% at Year 5

(past 12 months)

Huang et al. (2015) [34]

United States

Mothers interviewed in hospitals following giving birth

(n = 2410)

Secondary analysis of longitudinal data collected from the FFCWB Study

Two (2) items measuring financial control and work/school sabotage

28%

(when their child was one or three years old)

Jewkes et al. (2003) [35]

South Africa

Women between the ages of 18–49 living in South Africa

(n = 1164)

Cross-sectional representative sample using surveys

Items measuring financial control

(number of items unclear)

Not reported

Kanougiya et al. (2021) [36]

India

Ever-married women between ages 18–49 living in two informal settlements

(n = 4906)

Cross-sectional systematic random sample

15 items measuring EA

23%

(at least one form over their lifetime)

Kapiga et al. (2017) [37]

Tanzania

Ever partnered women participating in microfinance loan groups

(n = 1021)

Cross-sectional baseline survey from a cluster RCT

WHO Violence Against Women Instrument

(3 items)

34%

(past 12 months)

Johnson (2021) [38]

United States

Pregnant women in a relationship

(n = 183)

Cross-sectional convenience sample using surveys recruited via research panel service

SEA2

(14 items)

Not reported

Nicholson et al. (2018) [39]

United States

Mothers interviewed in hospitals birth

(n = 2389)

Secondary analysis of longitudinal data collected from the FFCWB Study

Two (2) items measuring financial control and work/school sabotage

28%

(lifetime at Year 1 and Year 3)

Postmus et al. (2012) [40]

United States

Mothers interviewed in hospitals following giving birth

(n = 2305)

Secondary analysis of longitudinal data collected from the FFCWB Study

Two (2) items measuring financial control and work/school sabotage

Not reported

Postmus et al. (2012) [4]

United States

Women receiving services from DV programs

(n = 120)

Cross-sectional study using data collected from a longitudinal evaluation of a financial empowerment program

SEA

(28 items)

94.2%

(in current relationship or last 12 months of most recent relationship)

Postmus et al. (2021) [41]

Cambodia, China, Papua New Guinea,

Sri Lanka

Women between the ages of 18–49

(n = 3105)

Cross-sectional study using multi-stage cluster sampling to survey participants

Four (4) items measuring EA

35.6%

(lifetime)

Sauber et al. (2020) [42]

United States

Female DV survivors recruited through agencies providing services to survivors, as well as online

(n = 147)

Cross-sectional convenience sample using surveys

SEA-12

(12 items)

95%

(at least one experience in the past 6 months)

Stockl & Penhale (2015) [43]

Germany

Women between the ages of 16–86 who received a letter inviting them to participate

(n = 10,264)

Secondary analysis of cross-sectional nationally representative data collected as part of the Health, Well-Being and Personal Safety of Women in Germany study

Items measuring financial control (number of items unclear)

12% of participants 16–49;

14% 50–65; 13% 66–86

(occurred with current partner)

Stylianou (2018) [44]

United States

Women receiving services from DV agencies

(n = 457)

Cross-sectional study using data collected from a longitudinal evaluation of a financial empowerment program

SEA-12

(12 items)

93%

(past 12 months)

Tenkorang & Owusu (2019) [45]

Ghana

Ever-married women aged 18 and older living within selected communities

(n = 2289)

Cross-sectional study using multi-stage simple random sampling to survey participants

Seven (7) items measuring employment sabotage, economic exploitation, and economic depravation

8.5% employment sabotage;

24% economic exploitation; 42% economic deprivation

(timeframe unclear)

Usta et al. (2007) [46]

Lebanon

Women seeking services in selected health clinics

(n = 1415)

Cross-sectional convenience sample using surveys

One (1) item measuring EA

12%

(lifetime)

Voth Schrag (2015) [47]

United States

Mothers interviewed in hospitals following giving birth

(n = 2775)

Secondary analysis of longitudinal data collected from the FFCWB Study

Two (2) items measuring financial control and work/school sabotage

14%

(timeframe unclear)

Voth Schrag et al. (2019) [48]

United States

Women enrolled in community college

(n = 435)

Cross-sectional study using simple random sample to survey participants

SEA-12

(12 items)

Not reported

Voth Schrag et al. (2020) [49]

United States

Women enrolled in community college

(n = 435)

Cross-sectional study using simple random sample to survey participants

SEA-12

(12 items)

43.8%

(at least one form of EA in past 12 months)

Yau et al. (2020) [50]

Hong Kong

Adults between the ages of 35–60

(n = 504)

Cross-sectional stratified systematic sample using surveys

Chinese

SEA-12

(C-SEA-12; 12 items)

36.5%

(past 12 months)

Yunus et al. (2017) [51]

Malaysia

Adults aged 60 or older living within selected districts

(n = 1927)

Longitudinal study using multi-stage cluster sampling strategy and administrative records

Adapted version of the Conflict Tactics Scale for Elder Abuse

8.1%

(experienced since turning age 60)

  1. DV Domestic violence, SA Sexual assault, EA Economic abuse, PTSD Post-traumatic stress disorder, FFCWB Fragile Families and Child Well-Being Study, SEA Scale of Economic Abuse, RCT Randomized controlled trial, WHO World Health Organization