Skip to main content

Table 6 Differences for change in educators’ strategies and barriers related to physical activity and sedentary behaviour in childcare settings (follow-up vs. baseline) between groups (accreditation vs. control)

From: The impact of new government childcare accreditation standards on children’s in-care physical activity and sedentary time

Subscales

Groupsa

Baseline

Follow-up

Follow-up vs. baseline

Group*time

  

Estimated marginal mean (SE)b

Mean difference (SE)

B (95%CI)c

P value

Strategies to support regular physical activity

Accreditation (n = 33)

4.40 (0.07)

4.53 (0.08)

0.13 (0.07)

0.13(−0.05,0.32)

0.151

Control (n = 39)

4.25 (0.07)

4.24 (0.07)

−0.002 (0.06)

Strategies to limit extended periods of sedentary behaviour

Accreditation (n = 33)

4.20 (0.10)

4.01 (0.13)

−0.19 (0.13)

−0.29(− 0.62,0.05)

0.092

Control (n = 39)

4.00 (0.09)

4.09 (0.11)

0.09 (0.11)

Strategies to limit screen time

Accreditation(n = 32)

4.35 (0.17)

4.35 (0.14)

−0.22 (0.21)

−0.27(− 0.82,0.27)

0.323

Control (n = 39)

4.25 (0.12)

4.30 (0.15)

0.05 (0.18)

Barriers in supporting regular physical activity

Accreditation (n = 33)

2.27 (0.13)

2.08 (0.20)

−0.19 (0.22)

−0.37(− 0.95,0.20)

0.202

Control (n = 39)

2.06 (0.12)

2.25 (0.16)

0.18 (0.19)

Barriers in limiting extended periods of sedentary behaviour

Accreditation (n = 33)

2.15 (0.11)

1.92 (0.19)

−0.23 (0.20)

−0.37(− 0.88,0.15)

0.160

Control (n = 39)

1.78 (0.10)

1.92 (0.16)

0.14 (0.17)

Barriers in limiting screen time

Accreditation (n = 31)

1.79 (0.09)

1.86 (0.19)

0.07 (0.20)

−0.03(−0.54,0.48)

0.905

Control (n = 38)

1.30 (0.15)

1.20 (0.08)

0.10 (0.16)

  1. Abbreviations: SE Standard error, CI Confidence interval
  2. In all models the clustering effect of childcare centers and the repeated effect of time were included as random intercepts, and time, group, time*group were included as fixed effects
  3. aSample size for educators included in the analytic sample: accreditation group (n = 33), control group (n = 39). Missing data existed for educators in the accreditation group for two subscales and in the control group for one subscale
  4. bHigher Mean (SE) scores indicate that the strategies used more frequently (Range: 1–5) or the barrier was faced more frequently (Range: 1–5)
  5. cEstimate for the interaction term between group (accreditation vs. control) and time (follow-up vs. baseline) and can be interpreted as the differences in change between groups for each subscale