Skip to main content

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of participants in India, Laos, and Tajikistan

From: Demographic and environmental factors associated with disability in India, Laos, and Tajikistan: a population-based cross-sectional study

Variable

India

(N = 3000)

Laos

(N = 2504)

Tajikistan (N = 3000)

p-value

Demographic Factors

Sex

   

 < 0.001

  Male

1721 (57.4%)

1151 (46.0%)

1173 (39.1%)

 

  Female

1279 (42.6%)

1353 (54.0%)

1827 (60.9%)

 

Age

   

0.001

  15–29

996 (33.2%)

748 (29.9%)

1042 (34.7%)

 

  30–49

1259 (42.0%)

1086 (43.4%)

1179 (39.3%)

 

  50 or above

745 (24.8%)

670 (26.8%)

779 (26.0%)

 

Marital status

   

0.098

  Not currently married

821 (27.4%)

640 (25.6%)

843 (28.1%)

 

  Married

2179 (72.6%)

1864 (74.4%)

2157 (71.9%)

 

Urban/rural setting

   

0.039

  Lives in a rural area, small town/village, or suburb

2760 (92.0%)

2256 (90.1%)

2744 (91.5%)

 

  Lives in a large city

240 (8.0%)

248 (9.9%)

256 (8.5%)

 

Per Capita Income Quintiles

   

0.079

  0-20%

510 (17.0%)

493 (19.7%)

504 (16.8%)

 

  20-40%

582 (19.4%)

473 (18.9%)

544 (18.1%)

 

  40-60%

606 (20.2%)

489 (19.5%)

587 (19.6%)

 

  60-80%

605 (20.2%)

497 (19.8%)

628 (20.9%)

 

  80-100%

697 (23.2%)

552 (22.0%)

737 (24.6%)

 

Education Level

   

 < 0.001

  Completed primary or less

1823 (60.8%)

1515 (60.5%)

644 (21.5%)

 

  Completed secondary

952 (31.7%)

755 (30.2%)

1628 (54.3%)

 

  Completed tertiary

225 (7.5%)

234 (9.3%)

728 (24.3%)

 

Employment Status

   

 < 0.001

  Unemployed

135 (4.5%)

7 (0.3%)

171 (5.7%)

 

  Employed full time for an employer

872 (29.1%)

362 (14.5%)

515 (17.2%)

 

  Employed full time for self

370 (12.3%)

1087 (43.4%)

110 (3.7%)

 

  Employed part time and do not want full time

257 (8.6%)

537 (21.4%)

268 (8.9%)

 

  Employed part time and want full time

301 (10.0%)

381 (15.2%)

299 (10.0%)

 

  Out of the workforce

1065 (35.5%)

130 (5.2%)

1637 (54.6%)

 

Environmental Factors

Community Basics Index

75.4 (26.9)

69.0 (25.5)

83.6 (19.4)

 < 0.001

Civic Engagement Index

32.6 (36.2)

27.9 (28.8)

36.6 (31.0)

 < 0.001

Communications Access Index

54.2 (31.6)

53.9 (35.3)

54.2 (33.2)

0.936

Financial Life Index

36.2 (26.8)

37.0 (20.5)

59.7 (30.6)

 < 0.001

Food and Shelter Index

62.4 (42.3)

44.6 (41.8)

62.9 (41.2)

 < 0.001

Law and Order Score

77.7 (26.8)

72.3 (32.7)

91.0 (20.1)

 < 0.001

Social Life Index

71.8 (33.5)

77.6 (29.7)

85.1 (26.3)

 < 0.001

Youth Development Index

81.7 (28.4)

80.6 (27.8)

91.1 (19.8)

 < 0.001

MDS Variables

 Capacity Score

9.9 (0.0, 37.8)

37.8 (24.2, 48.3)

9.9 (0.0, 31.1)

 < 0.001

 Disability Score

28.0 (1.4, 45.3)

41.5 (30.9, 49.5)

11.3 (1.4, 35.0)

 < 0.001

 Assistive Technology (AT)

   

 < 0.001

  Do not use AT and do not need any AT

2131 (71.0%)

1636 (65.3%)

2155 (71.8%)

 

  Use AT and do not need more AT

556 (18.5%)

414 (16.5%)

570 (19.0%)

 

  Need more AT

313 (10.4%)

454 (18.1%)

275 (9.2%)

 

Health Conditions

  Vision Loss

263 (8.8%)

373 (14.9%)

299 (10.0%)

 < 0.001

  Hearing Loss (partial or total)

148 (4.9%)

204 (8.1%)

114 (3.8%)

 < 0.001

  Heart disease (coronary heart disease, heart attack)

92 (3.1%)

236 (9.4%)

303 (10.1%)

 < 0.001

  Stroke

66 (2.2%)

43 (1.7%)

48 (1.6%)

0.192

  Diabetes

123 (4.1%)

97 (3.9%)

76 (2.5%)

0.002

  Arthritis

291 (9.7%)

389 (15.5%)

379 (12.6%)

 < 0.001

  Bronchitis or emphysema

113 (3.8%)

100 (4.0%)

113 (3.8%)

0.884

  Asthma or allergic respiratory disease

157 (5.2%)

245 (9.8%)

206 (6.9%)

 < 0.001

  Back pain

656 (21.9%)

1224 (48.9%)

1067 (35.6%)

 < 0.001

  Depression

371 (12.4%)

305 (12.2%)

419 (14.0%)

0.084

  Anxiety

612 (20.4%)

511 (20.4%)

371 (12.4%)

 < 0.001

  Trauma

153 (5.1%)

243 (9.7%)

111 (3.7%)

 < 0.001

  1. For the capacity and disability scores, the median (first quartile, third quartile) is shown. For categorical and binary variables, the number in each category (percentage of total participants) is shown. For the environmental factors, the mean (standard deviation) is shown. Sampling weights were not used to adjust these values, so this table should be interpreted as representing the characteristics of the sample but not of the countries themselves