Skip to main content

Table 2 Context- mechanism- and outcome- related variables for quantitative analysis

From: Do the implementation processes of a school-based daily physical activity (DPA) program vary according to the socioeconomic context of the schools? a realist evaluation of the Active at school program

 

Variables

Measures

Categories

Variables related to context

Socioeconomic setting of the school

School-level SES calculated by Quebec Ministry of Education [34]

“High SES”; “Middle SES”; “Low SES”

Geographic setting of the school

School postal code

“Rural”; “Urban”

Number of students at the school

Questionnaire, year 1, closed-ended question

NA – continuous variable

Teacher and PE teacher turnover

Questionnaire, year 2, closed-ended question

“Yes, major turnover (≥ 25%)”; “Yes, minor turnover (< 25%)”; “No”

School-team resistance encountered

Questionnaire, year 1, closed-ended question

“Yes, from more than half the members”; “Yes, from about half the members”; “Yes, from a minority of members”; “No”

Per-student financial amount received

Questionnaire, year 1, closed-ended question

NA—continuous variable

Variables related to mechanisms

Students involved in implementation

Questionnaire, year 3, closed-ended question

“Yes”; “No”

Student participation

Questionnaire, year 3, closed-ended question

“Yes”; “No”

Educational plan modified

Questionnaire, year 3, closed-ended question

“Yes”; “No”

Champions recognized

Questionnaire, year 3, closed-ended and open-ended questions

“Yes”; “No” and qualitative data

Intention to maintain the leader’s role

Questionnaire, year 3, closed-ended question

“Yes”; “No”; “NA (we didn’t have a designated leader)”

Intention to maintain a DPA committee

Questionnaire, year 3, closed-ended question

“Yes”; “No”; “NA (we didn’t form a committee)”

Intention to maintain formal meetings about DPA

Questionnaire, year 3, closed-ended question

“Yes”; “No”; “NA (we didn’t hold formal meetings)”

Positive/negative changes in students observed

Questionnaire, year 3, closed-ended question

“Yes”; “No”

Strategies for finding alternative sources of funding

Questionnaire, year 3, closed-ended question

“Yes”; “No”

Strategies for supporting new staff

Questionnaire, year 3, closed-ended and open-ended questions

“Yes”; “No” and qualitative data

Strategies for updating activities

Questionnaire, year 3, closed-ended and open-ended questions

“Yes”; “No” and qualitative data

Partnerships maintained

Questionnaire, year 3, closed-ended question

“Yes”; “No”; “NA (we didn’t form any new partnerships)”

Variables related to outcomes

New in-class PA routines integrated

Active breaks

Questionnaire, year 3, closed-ended question

“Yes”; “No”

Active learning activities

Questionnaire, year 3, closed-ended question

“Yes”; “No”

New PA routines integrated at the school

Active recesses

Questionnaire, year 3, closed-ended question

“Yes”; “No”

Active corridors

Questionnaire, year 3, closed-ended question

“Yes”; “No”

Active assemblies

Questionnaire, year 3, closed-ended question

“Yes”; “No”

Outdoor field trips

Questionnaire, year 3, closed-ended question

“Yes”; “No”

New PA routines integrated at daycare services

Questionnaire, year 3, closed-ended question

“Yes”; “No”

Change in the perceived value of PA for its contribution to academic success

Questionnaire, year 3, closed-ended and open-ended questions

“Yes”; “No” and qualitative data

Change in the commitment of homeroom teachers to daily PA

Questionnaire, year 3, closed-ended and open-ended questions

“Increased”; “No change”; “Decreased” and qualitative data

Change in the commitment of PE teachers to daily PA

Questionnaire, year 3, closed-ended and open-ended questions

“Increased”; “No change”; “Decreased” and qualitative data

Change in the commitment of daycare staff to daily PA

Questionnaire, year 3, closed-ended and open-ended questions

“Increased”; “No change”; “Decreased” and qualitative data