Skip to main content

Table 17 Impact on perceptions of future (behaviour) (OLS)

From: How (not) to mobilize health workers in the fight against vaccine hesitancy: Experimental evidence from Germany’s AstraZeneca controversy

 

Living conditions

Health-related behaviour

Parameter

No Covid

Easy travels

Open bars

Covid-App

DPT vaccine

 

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

T1: Scientific AZ debate

0.050

0.003

0.094

0.023

0.127

 

(0.080)

(0.088)

(0.090)

(0.053)

(0.090)

T2: Misinformation

0.113

0.090

0.120

-0.019

0.162

 

(0.079)

(0.088)

(0.090)

(0.053)

(0.090)*

T3: Own health

-0.015

-0.023

0.009

-0.062

0.056

 

(0.078)

(0.087)

(0.088)

(0.052)

(0.089)

T4: Public health

-0.084

-0.012

-0.057

-0.022

0.070

 

(0.079)

(0.088)

(0.089)

(0.052)

(0.090)

Observations

3,173

3,173

3,173

3,289

3,264

State FE

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Basic Controls

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

  1. Notes: ‘AZ’ refers to AstraZeneca. State FE include controls for respondents place of residence (state). Basic controls include respondent’s age, gender, education, and survey specifics (order of vaccine-related questions, platform, device). Robust standard errors used. Standard errors are in parentheses. */**/*** denotes 10/5/1 percent significance levels
Back to article page

BMC Public Health

ISSN: 1471-2458

Contact us