Skip to main content

Table 8 Results of two-way sensitivity analysis: cost-effectiveness of interventions aiming at promoting breastfeeding

From: The cost-effectiveness of antenatal and postnatal education and support interventions for women aimed at promoting breastfeeding in the UK

 

Intervention cost

£20

£25

£30

£35

£40

£45

£50

£55

£60

£65

£70

£75

£80

£84

£90

£95

£100

Intervention effect

1.05

£45,852

£61,166

£76,480

£91,795

£107,109

£122,423

£137,737

£153,052

£168,366

£183,680

£198,994

£214,309

£229,623

£241,874

£260,251

£275,566

£290,880

1.10

£15,224

£22,881

£30,538

£38,195

£45,852

£53,509

£61,166

£68,823

£76,480

£84,138

£91,795

£99,452

£107,109

£113,235

£122,423

£130,080

£137,737

1.15

£5014

£10,119

£15,224

£20,328

£25,433

£30,538

£35,642

£40,747

£45,852

£50,957

£56,061

£61,166

£66,271

£70,355

£76,480

£81,585

£86,690

1.19

£631

£4640

£8649

£12,658

£16,667

£20,676

£24,685

£28,694

£32,703

£36,712

£40,721

£44,729

£48,738

£51,946

£56,756

£60,765

£64,774

1.25

dominant

dominant

£2972

£6035

£9098

£12,161

£15,224

£18,286

£21,349

£24,412

£27,475

£30,538

£33,601

£36,051

£39,726

£42,789

£45,852

1.30

dominant

dominant

dominant

£2462

£5014

£7566

£10,119

£12,671

£15,224

£17,776

£20,328

£22,881

£25,433

£27,475

£30,538

£33,090

£35,642

1.35

dominant

dominant

dominant

dominant

£2097

£4285

£6473

£8660

£10,848

£13,036

£15,224

£17,411

£19,599

£21,349

£23,974

£26,162

£28,350

1.40

dominant

dominant

dominant

dominant

dominant

£1824

£3738

£5652

£7566

£9481

£11,395

£13,309

£15,224

£16,755

£19,052

£20,966

£22,881

1.45

dominant

dominant

dominant

dominant

dominant

dominant

£1611

£3312

£5014

£6716

£8417

£10,119

£11,820

£13,182

£15,224

£16,925

£18,627

1.50

dominant

dominant

dominant

dominant

dominant

dominant

dominant

£1441

£2972

£4504

£6035

£7566

£9098

£10,323

£12,161

£13,692

£15,224

1.55

dominant

dominant

dominant

dominant

dominant

dominant

dominant

dominant

£1301

£2694

£4086

£5478

£6870

£7984

£9655

£11,047

£12,439

1.60

dominant

dominant

dominant

dominant

dominant

dominant

dominant

dominant

dominant

£1185

£2462

£3738

£5014

£6035

£7566

£8843

£10,119

1.65

dominant

dominant

dominant

dominant

dominant

dominant

dominant

dominant

dominant

dominant

£1087

£2265

£3443

£4386

£5799

£6977

£8155

1.70

dominant

dominant

dominant

dominant

dominant

dominant

dominant

dominant

dominant

dominant

dominant

£1003

£2097

£2972

£4285

£5379

£6473

1.75

dominant

dominant

dominant

dominant

dominant

dominant

dominant

dominant

dominant

dominant

dominant

dominant

£930

£1747

£2972

£3993

£5014

1.80

dominant

dominant

dominant

dominant

dominant

dominant

dominant

dominant

dominant

dominant

dominant

dominant

dominant

£675

£1824

£2781

£3738

1.85

dominant

dominant

dominant

dominant

dominant

dominant

dominant

dominant

dominant

dominant

dominant

dominant

dominant

dominant

£810

£1711

£2612

1.90

dominant

dominant

dominant

dominant

dominant

dominant

dominant

dominant

dominant

dominant

dominant

dominant

dominant

dominant

dominant

£760

£1611

1.95

dominant

dominant

dominant

dominant

dominant

dominant

dominant

dominant

dominant

dominant

dominant

dominant

dominant

dominant

dominant

dominant

£715

2.00

dominant

dominant

dominant

dominant

dominant

dominant

dominant

dominant

dominant

dominant

dominant

dominant

dominant

dominant

dominant

dominant

dominant

  1. Result cells with bold content: results where ICER < £20,000/QALY; or where intervention + standard care is dominant = less costly and more effective than standard care alone
  2. Result cells with content in italics: results where ICER is between £20,000–£30,000/QALY (lower - upper NICE cost-effectiveness threshold)
  3. All other result cells: results where ICER > £30,000/QALY
  4. Underlined figures: intervention cost and effect values used in the base-case analysis; result of the base-case analysis