Skip to main content

Table 3 Risk of bias and study quality assessment

From: The psychological impact of paediatric burn injuries: a systematic review

Study

Non-burn comparison group?

Validated measure or confirmed diagnosis

Power analysis

Appropriate analysis

Prospective or longitudinal design (> 18mo)

Total

Boles, 2018

0

1

0

1

1

3

Brown, 2014

0

1

1

1

0

3

Brown, 2014

0

1

1

1

0

3

Bushroe, 2018

1

1

0

1

0

4

Chester, 2018

0

1

1

1

0

3

Chrapusta, 2014

0

1

0

1

0

2

Conn, 2017

0

0

1

1

0

2

DeYoung, 2012

0

1

0

1

0

2

DeYoung, 2014

0

1

0

1

0

2

Duke, 2018

1

1

0

1

1

4

Enlow, 2019

0

1

1

1

0

3

Goodhew, 2014

0

1

0

1

1

3

Graf, 2011

0

1

0

1

0

2

Haag, 2017

0

1

0

1

0

3

Hyland, 2015

0

1

1

1

0

3

Jeffs, 2014

0

1

1

1

0

3

Khadra, 2018

0

1

1

1

0

3

Laitakari, 2015

1

1

0

1

1

4

Maskell, 2013, 2014

1

1

1

1

0

4

Murphy, 2015

1

1

0

1

1

4

Nelson, 2020

0

1

0

1

0

2

Nicolosi, 2013

0

1

0

1

1

3

Nodoushani, 2018

0

0

0

0

1

1

Pardo, 2010

0

1

0

1

0

2

Parlak Gurol, 2010

0

1

0

1

0

2

Quezada, 2016

0

1

0

1

1

3

Rezazadeh, 2020

0

1

1

1

0

3

Rimmer, 2014a/b

0

1

0

1

0

2

Riobueno-Naylor, 2020

0

1

0

1

1

3

Rosenberg, 2015

0

1

0

1

1

3

Russell, 2013

0

1

0

1

1

3

Sharp, 2010

0

1

1

1

0

3

Stoddard, 2011

0

1

0

1

0

2

Sveen, 2012

0

1

0

1

1

3

Thomas, 2012

0

1

0

1

0

2

Tropez-Arceneaux, 2017

0

1

0

0

1

2

Warner, 2012

0

1

0

1

1

3

Weedon, 2011

0

1

0

1

0

3

Willebrand, 2011

0

1

0

1

0

2

  1. Note: 1 = present, 0 = not present