Skip to main content

Table 5 An overview of assessment and timeline for the implementation

From: Preventing opioid use among justice-involved youth as they transition to adulthood: leveraging safe adults (LeSA)

Construct and Instrument

Brief Description

Measurement Time Points

Participant

  

Start of Baseline or New Recruitment

Start of Staff TBRI Training

End of Staff TBRI Training or Start of Follow-up

End of Follow-up

 

 Survey for Juvenile Justice Secure Facilities

Agency and youth characteristics, staffing, clinical assessment, behavioral, treatment services, family engagement.

x

x

x

x

Agency administrator or designated representative

 Staff Background

Staff age, race, ethnicity, education, work experiences.

x

   

All JJ staff

 SOFL, PQL

Climate and staff characteristics.

x

x

x

x

All JJ staff

 ACEs

Staff ACEs

x

   

All JJ staff

 ARTIC

Attitudes toward trauma-informed care.

x

x

x

x

All JJ staff

 TBRI Acceptability, Appropriateness, and Feasibility

Staff attitudes toward TBR

 

x

x

x

All JJ staff

 TBRI Professional Use

Staff use of TBRI strategies.

x

x

x

x

All JJ staff

 COVID-19 Impact

COVID-19 impact on staff, work environment, and services for youth.

x

x

x

x

All JJ staff

 JJ Staff Focus Group

Use of trauma-informed strategies, facilitators and barriers to uptake of new interventions, use of TBRI, agency interest/success in sustaining and/or expanding TBRI practices.

x

x

x

x

Leadership and line staff, separately.

  1. Note: SOFL = Survey of Organizational Functioning, PQL = Professional Quality of Life, ACEs = Adverse Childhood Experiences, ARTIC = Attitudes Related to Trauma-Informed Care, BSSS = Berlin Social Support Scale