Skip to main content

Table 5 General study information, intervention characteristics, and findings from included reviews

From: Determining what constitutes an effective psychosocial ‘return to work’ intervention: a systematic review and narrative synthesis

Author (year)

Type of review

Objective

Study Types

Participants

Findings

de Boer, Taskila [2]

Systematic review & meta-analysis

Evaluate the effectiveness of RTW interventions

15 RCTs

Adults with cancer diagnosis and employed (n = 1835)

Low quality evidence that psycho-educational interventions are equivalent to CAU. Moderate quality evidence that multi-disciplinary interventions are superior to CAU.

Fong, Murphy [43]

Systematic review & meta-analysis

Evaluate the effectiveness of RTW interventions

8 RCTs, 4 quasi-experimental

Adults with current or past cancer diagnosis (n = 2151)

Multi-component interventions, including one or more behavioural, psychological, educational or vocational component appear to improve employment status for cancer patients, but high risk of bias in the literature means results should be interpreted with caution. Methodological limitations make isolating specific components difficult.

Hoefsmit, Houkes [1]

Systematic review

Investigate intervention characteristics that facilitate RTW

18 quantitative, 5 systematic reviews

Adults on sick leave for any reason (n unclear)

Generally, early timed (within 6-weeks of initial sick leave) and multi-disciplinary RTW interventions are effective. For musculoskeletal-related sick leave, time-contingent and activating (e.g., gradual RTW) interventions are effective.

Mikkelsen and Michael [3]

Systematic review & meta-analysis

Investigate the effectiveness of RTW interventions

31 RCTs, 8 controlled trials

Adults on sick leave with common psychological, stress, somatoform, or personality disorders (n = 38,938)

Timing, duration, gradual RTW, and therapeutic elements had no consistent effect. Interventions with workplace contact and multiple components were effective. Interventions targeting stress disorders were effective. Effect sizes / improvements were small.

Palmer, Harris [44]

Systematic review

Investigate the effectiveness of RTW interventions

34 RCTs, 8 cohort studies

Adults on sick leave with musculoskeletal disorders (n unclear)

Early timed and low duration interventions were effective. Interventions that included gradual RTW were effective. Effects were only modest. The other characteristics were ineffective.

Stergiopoulos, Cimo [45]

Systematic review

Investigate the effectiveness of RTW interventions

1 systematic review, 3 RCTs, 3 pre-post

Adults on sick leave with work-related PTSD (n = 212, in 6 original studies)

There was good preliminary evidence for the effectiveness of exposure in RTW interventions.

Vogel, Schandelmaier [13]

Systematic review & meta-analysis

Investigate the effectiveness of RTW interventions compared to CAU

14 RCTs

Adults on sick leave or with disability (n = 12,568)

Review found that RTW programs had no effects compared to usual practice on RTW outcomes.

  1. Note: CAU care as usual
  2. aIntervention characteristics were only included if they were relevant to the current study (i.e., components of low/medium intensity psychosocial interventions).
  3. bFeedback referred to interventions that involved psychological screening followed by individual feedback (e.g., coping strategies) in the case of positive diagnosis.