Skip to main content

Table 3 Results from Logistic Regression Analyses Predicting Adolescent and Emerging Adult Eating Disorder Symptoms (N = 8117) by Discrimination Experiences Complemented by Age and Sex Interactions with Discrimination Experiences (Model 2), while Controlling for Age, Sex, Parental SES, Body Image, Self-efficacy, Social Media Use, Social Support

From: The role of weight- and appearance-related discrimination on eating disorder symptoms among adolescents and emerging adults

 

Eating disorder symptoms (EDs)

Predictors Model 2

OR

95% CI

p

Age

0.98

0.89–1.09

.806

Sex

 Male vs. Female

8.62

3.33–22.33

<.001

Parental SES

 low vs. medium

1.07

0.89–1.30

.492

 low vs. high

1.18

0.95–1.47

.125

Body image

 Just right vs. little too thin/thick

3.64

1.65–8.05

.001

 Just right vs. much too thin/thick

3.73

1.15–11.99

.027

Self-efficacy

0.99

0.98–1.00

<.001

Social media use

1.38

1.09–1.75

.008

Social support

1.00

0.98–1.02

.804

Weight-related discrimination

 Never vs. seldom

2.67

1.13–6.30

.025

 Never vs. sometimes

1.20

0.41–3.50

.743

 Never vs. often

2.04

0.33–12.80

.443

 Never vs. very often

0.89

0.05–17.55

.939

Appearance-related discrimination

 Never vs. seldom

1.80

0.79–4.09

.158

 Never vs. sometimes

4.53

1.53–13.46

.007

 Never vs. often

4.66

0.63–34.19

.131

 Never vs. very often

3.20

0.14–74.93

.468

Age interactions

 Age × BI right vs. little too thin/thick

0.98

0.94–1.01

.1201

 Age × BI right vs. much too thin/thick

1.01

0.95–1.06

.789

 Age × Self-efficacy

1.00

0.99–1.00

.598

 Age × Social media use

0.99

0.98–1.00

.171

 Age × Social support

1.00

0.99–1.00

.952

 Age × seldom weight-related discrimination

1.00

0.96–1.04

.872

 Age × sometimes weight-related discrimination

1.06

1.00–1.11

.046

 Age × often weight-related discrimination

1.06

0.97–1.14

.181

 Age × very often seldom weight-related discrimination

1.09

0.95–1.24

.223

 Age × seldom appearance-related discrimination

0.98

0.95–1.02

.337

 Age × sometimes appearance-related discrimination

0.94

0.89–0.99

.026

 Age × often appearance-related discrimination

0.93

0.85–1.01

.103

 Age × very often appearance-related discrimination

0.98

0.84–1.13

.771

Sex interactions

 Sex × BI right vs. little too thin/thick

1.41

0.99–2.01

.054

 Sex × BI right vs. much too thin/thick

1.32

0.81–2.15

.272

 Sex × Self-efficacy

1.00

0.98–1.01

.518

 Sex × Social media use

0.96

0.86–1.06

.389

 Sex × Social support

0.99

0.98–0.99

.019

 Sex × seldom weight-related discrimination

0.51

0.35–0.73

<.001

 Sex × sometimes weight-related discrimination

0.48

0.31–0.75

.001

 Sex × often weight-related discrimination

0.17

0.08–0.33

<.001

 Sex × very often weight-related discrimination

0.23

0.07–0.79

.020

 Sex × seldom appearance-related discrimination

1.04

0.73–1.47

.827

 Sex × sometimes appearance-related discrimination

0.97

0.62–1.53

.900

 Sex × often appearance-related discrimination

0.98

0.42–2.34

.977

 Sex × very often appearance-related discrimination

1.28

0.35–4.70

.709

  1. Note. OR = adjusted odds ratio, SES = socioeconomic status, BI = body image. Significant results at p < .05 are highlighted in boldface. Self-efficacy and social support are indicated by a sum score ranging between 0 (min) and 100 (max). Social media use is indicated by the average time spent in hours a day, ranging from 0 (never) to 5 (five hours or more). Model 2 Pseudo R2 = .15