Skip to main content

Table 4 Synthesis of application of intersectionality in included studies

From: “Applying Intersectionality in designing and implementing health interventions: a scoping review”

 

Possible response to each question

Intersecting Categories

Multilevel Analysis

Power

Reflexivity

Time & Space

Diverse Knowledge

Social Justice & Equity

Problem Identification

Yes

11 (91.66%)

6 (75%)

8 (66.66%)

0

1 (25%)

5 (62.5%)

3 (37.5%)

No

1 (8.33%)

2 (25%)

4 (33.33%)

0

3 (75%)

3 (37.5%)

3 (37.5%)

Unclear

0

0

0

4 (100%)

0

0

2 (25%)

Number of questions a

12

8

12

4

4

8

8

Design & implementation

Yes

8 (100%)

1 (25%)

19 (79.16%)

1 (25%)

3 (75%)

4 (50%)

4 (50%)

No

0

3 (75%)

1 (4.16%)

0

0

0

0

Unclear

0

0

4 (16.66%)

3 (75%)

1 (25%)

4 (50%)

4 (50%)

Number of questions a

8

4

24

4

4

8

8

Evaluation

Yes

0

1 (25%)

5 (62.5%)

0

Not relevant b

4 (50%)

0

No

4 (100%)

3 (75%)

3 (37.5%)

0

Not relevant b

4 (50%)

4 (50%)

Unclear

0

0

0

4 (100%)

Not relevant b

0

4 (50%)

Number of questions a

4

4

8

4

0

8

8

Overall

Yes

19 (79.16%)

8 (50%)

32 (72.72%)

1 (8.33%)

4 (50%)

13 (54.16%)

7 (29.16%)

No

5 (20.83%)

8 (50%)

8 (18.18%)

0

3 (37.5%)

7 (29.16%)

7 (29.16%)

Unclear

0

0

4 (9.09%)

11 (91.66%)

1 (12.5%)

4 (16.66%)

10 (41.66%)

Number of questions a

24

16

44

12

8

24

24

  1. The numbers in each cell are the sum and percentage of “yes”, “no” or “unclear” responses to questions on each stage of “problem identification”, “design & implementation”, and “evaluation”
  2. aTotal number of questions of each principle for all included studies. For example, the number of questions of “Intersecting Categories” principle in stage of “problem identification” (n = 3), totally is 12 for four included studies
  3. bThe checklist had no any question for the principle of “time and place” in the stage of “evaluation”