Family planning use and correlates among female sex workers in a community empowerment HIV prevention intervention in Iringa, Tanzania: a case for tailored programming

Table 5 Relative Risk of Current Family Planning Use by Program Exposure (n = 185)^a

	Unadjusted Relative Risk Ratio RR (95% CIs)	p-value	Adjusted Relative Risk Ratio aRR (95% CIs) ^b	P-value
Any Program Exposure at Shikamana Center	1.30 (1.05–1.61)	0.018	1.26 (1.02–1.56)	0.029
Family Planning Program Exposure	1.43 (1.18–1.73)	< 0.001	1.36 (1.13–1.64)	0.001

^a Intervention community only; Missing n = 2; Initial stepwise backward modified Poisson logistic regression models with robust standard errors, controlling for number of clients per week and history of modern FP use at baseline; final model included history of modern FP use at baseline

ISSN: 1471-2458