Skip to main content

Table 4 Results of logistic regression models of factors predicting good/excellent work ability compared with the lifetime best

From: Work-life balance predicted work ability two years later: a cohort study of employees in the Swedish energy and water sector

  

Crude

OR 95% CI

Model 1

OR 95% CI

Model 2

OR 95% CI

Model 3

OR 95% CI

Model 4

OR 95% CI

Work-life balance

WIPLa

2.12** (1.49 to 2.98)

1.72** (1.18 to 2.49)

1.90** (1.27 to 2.84)

1.93** (1.26 to 2.94)

1.77** (1.15 to 2.73)

PLIWa

4.67** (2.59 to 8.43)

3.70** (2.01 to 6.80)

3.82** (2.01 to 7.26)

4.13** (2.08 to 8.21)

3.34** (1.66 to 6.74)

Employment

Company

     

Company 1

1

 

1

1

1

Company 2

1.18 (0.45 to 3.09)

 

1.39 (0.46 to 4.25)

1.65 (0.52 to 5.25)

1.87 (0.58 to 6.08)

Company 3

0.67 (0.25 to 1.74)

 

0.60 (0.20 to 1.81)

0.61 (0.20 to 1.88)

0.65 (0.21 to 2.07)

Position at work

     

Production

1

 

1

1

1

Administration

1.23 (0.68 to 2.22)

 

1.04 (0.46 to 2.36)

1.10 (0.45 to 2.67)

1.12 (0.46 to 2.73)

Manager

1.77 (0.81 to 3.88)

 

2.85 (0.90 to 9.03)

3.41 (0.99 to 11.70)

3.55* (1.02 to 12.36)

Experience of leadership qualityb

1.37 (0.96 to 1.94)

 

1.45 (0.95 to 2.23)

1.45 (0.94 to 2.23)

1.48 (0.94 to 2.35)

Demographic

Gender

     

Male

1

  

1

1

Female

0.81 (0.47 to 1.42)

  

0.97 (0.41 to 2.30)

1.01 (0.42 to 2.42)

Age

0.96 (0.96 to 1.03)

  

0.97 (0.94 to 1.01)

0.98 (0.94 to 1.02)

Education level

     

University

1

  

1

1

Secondary school or equal

0.64 (0.29 to 1.43)

  

0.48 (0.16 to 1.43)

0.43 (0.14 to 1.33)

Compulsory school

0.55 (0.24 to 1.28)

  

0.56 (0.15 to 1.20)

0.48 (0.13 to 1.79)

Baseline work ability regarding work ability compared with the lifetime best

Poor/moderate at T0

1

   

1

Good/excellent at T0

8.91** (2.67 to 29.79)

   

4.63* (1.28 to 16.76)

Nagelkerke R Square (R2)

 

24%

31%

32%

36%

ΔR2

  

7%

1%

4%

  1. Odds ratio (OR), 95% CI: 95% confidence interval of factors predicting good/excellent work ability compared with the lifetime best. Work ability compared with the lifetime best was dichotomized into: Poor/moderate work ability compared to lifetime best (=0) and good/excellent work ability compared to lifetime best (=1). *P ≤ 0.05, **P ≤ 0.01 aWork interference with personal life (WIPL) and personal life interference with work (PLIW), was both three item index scales, ranging from 1 to 5 bExperience with leadership quality was measured with an index, ranging from 1 to 6. Model 1 = PLIW+WIPL, Model 2 = Model 1 + company+position at work+experience of leadership quality, Model 3 = Model 2 + gender+age + education level, Model 4 = Model 3 + baseline work ability compared with the lifetime best