Authors (year of publication) | Details of the intervention | Study design | Target of the intervention | Main findings | Effect Size |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gatekeeper interventions for students | |||||
Mitchell et al., 2013 [53] | Brief psychoeducation Question, Persuade, Refer (QPR) gatekeeper training | Open trial (no control group with a postintervention and 3 to 6 month follow up) | Change knowledge | Significant increase in knowledge of suicide prevention facts. | Large (d = 1.46) |
Increase in help-seeking behaviour | No significant increase in ability to referred anyone to on-campus mental health services. | Small (d = 0.12) | |||
Pasco et al., 2012 [54] | Campus connect (didactic training and experimental exercises) gatekeeper training | Open trial (control group received a 1.5-h adapted format of Campus Connect with postintervention only) | Increase in help-seeking behaviour | Significant increase in crisis intervention skills. | Large (d = 1.21)a |
Rallis et al., 2018 [55] | Brief Psychoeducation and experimental (modelled after the Campus Connect training) | Open trial (no control group and postintervention and 3 month follow up) | Change knowledge | Significant increase in declarative knowledge. | Large (d = 1.62)a |
Significant increase in perceived knowledge. | Large (d = 1.41)a | ||||
Significant reduction in declarative knowledge at 3-month follow-up. | Large (d = 0.94)a | ||||
Significant reduction in perceived knowledge at 3-month follow-up. | Large (d = 1.10)a | ||||
Increase in help-seeking behaviour | Significant increase in identifying any suicidal students. | Small (d = 0.12)a | |||
Significant increase in making at least one referral. | Small (d = 0.24)a | ||||
Taub et al., 2013 [56] | Knowledge and crisis communications skills | Open trial (no control group and postintervention follow up) | Change knowledge | Significant increase in knowledge of suicide among new resident assistants. | Small (ηp2 = 0.16)a |
Significant increase in knowledge of suicide warning signs among new resident assistants. | Small (ηp2 = 0.24)a | ||||
Significant increase in places to refer among new resident assistants. | Small (ηp2 = 0.30)a | ||||
No significant increase in knowledge of suicide among returning resident assistants. | Small (ηp2 = 0.00)a | ||||
No significant increase in suicide warning signs among returning resident assistants. | Small (ηp2 = 0.00)a | ||||
No significant increase in places to refer among returning resident assistants. | Small (ηp2 = 0.00)a | ||||
Increase in help-seeking behaviour | No significant prediction of crisis communication skills among new resident assistants. | Small (ηp2 = 0.00)a | |||
No significant prediction of crisis communication skills among returning resident assistants. | Small (ηp2 = 0.15)a | ||||
Tompkins and Witt, 2009 [57] | Brief psychoeducation Question, Persuade, Refer (QPR) gatekeeper training | Quasi-experimental non-equivalent control group design (control group option to be waitlisted or treatment as usual with postintervention and 6 month follow up) | Change knowledge | Significant increase among intervention group for self-evaluation of knowledge. | Medium (d = 0.51)a |
Increase in help-seeking behaviour | Significant increase among intervention group for perceived efficacy to refer. | Small (d = 0.49)a | |||
Wachter Morris et al., 2015 [58] | The ALIVE @ Purdue train-the trainers program | Open trial (no control group with postintervention follow up) | Change knowledge | No significant increase in knowledge about suicide. | Medium (d = 0.62)a |
No significant increase in knowledge about potential warning signs. | Small (d = 0.14)a | ||||
No significant increase in knowledge about places to refer. | Small (d = 0.00)a | ||||
Increase in help-seeking behaviour | Significant increase in crisis-related communication skills. | Large (d = 0.95)a | |||
Gatekeeper training programmes for staff | |||||
Cimini et al., 2014 [59] | Gatekeeper training (tailored to group specific needs) involving didactic and experiential learning components highlighting the opportunity for behavioural rehearsal | Open trial (no control group with postintervention and 3-month follow up) | Change knowledge | Significant increase in knowledge about suicidal behaviour at postintervention. | Large (d = 0.78)a |
Significant reduction in knowledge about suicidal behaviour at follow up assessment. | Small (d = 0.4)a | ||||
Increase in help-seeking behaviour | Significant increase in comfort level to intervene with suicidal behaviour at postintervention. | Medium (d = 0.74)a | |||
Significant reduction in comfort level to intervene at follow up assessment but remained significantly higher than baseline. | Medium (d = 0.58)a | ||||
Cross et al., 2010 [60] | Brief psychoeducation - QPR (Question, Persuade, Refer) gatekeeper training | Open trial (no control group with a postintervention follow up) | Change knowledge | Significant increase in knowledge about suicide at postintervention assessment. | Large (d = 2.28)a |
Increase in help-seeking behaviour | Significant increase in perceived efficacy to intervene in suicide at postintervention assessment. | Large (d = 2.94)a | |||
Hashimoto., 2016 [61] | Gatekeeper-training based on the mental health first aid program | Single-arm follow-up study (no control group with postintervention and 1-month follow up) | Increase in help-seeking behaviour | Significant improvement in the competence of managing suicidal students and behavioural intention at postintervention. | Small (d = 0.46) |
Significant improvement in the competence of managing suicidal students and behavioural intention at follow-up. | Small (d = 0.35) | ||||
Significant improvement in the confidence of managing suicidal students and behavioural intention at postintervention. | Medium (d = 0.59) | ||||
Significant improvement in the confidence of managing suicidal students and behavioural intention at follow-up. | Small (d = 0.35) | ||||
Mclean et al., 2017 [62] | Adapted version of brief psychoeducation - Question, Persuade, Refer (QPR) gatekeeper training | RCT (stress and time management skills training program with a 16 weeks postintervention follow up) | Increase in help-seeking behaviour | Non-significant increase in number of interventions performed. | Small (ηp2 = 0.002)a |
Non-significant increase in number of times approached by a resident. | Small (ηp2 = 0.001)a | ||||
Non-significant increase in number of suicidal residents reported. | Small (ηp2 = 0.005)a | ||||
Non-significant increase in suicidal thought severity. | Small (ηp2 = 0.012)a | ||||
Shannonhouse et al., 2017 [63] | Brief Psychoeducation -Applied Suicide Intervention skills training (ASIST) | Quasi-experimental pretest–posttest design (wait-list control group with postintervention follow up only) | Change knowledge | Significant increase in knowledge about suicide across time. | Small (ηp2 = 0.28)a |
Change attitudes | Significant increase in participants’ attitudes about suicide across time. | Small (ηp2 = 0.32)a | |||
Increase in help-seeking behaviour | Significant increase in comfort to respond to persons-at-risk. | Small (ηp2 = 0.25)a | |||
Significant increase in competence to respond to persons-at-risk. | Small (ηp2 = 0.38)a | ||||
Significant increase in confidence to respond to persons-at-risk. | Small (ηp2 = 0.14)a | ||||
Wyman et al., 2008 [64] | QPR (Question, Persuade, Refer) gatekeeper training versus wait-list control group | RCT (wait-list control group with postintervention and 1 year follow up) | Change knowledge | Significant increase in self-reported knowledge. No significant increase noted among staff who received a 30-min refresher training several months after initial training. | Small (d = 0.41)a |
Increase in help-seeking behaviour | Significant increase in appraisals of efficacy to perform a gatekeeper role. | Large (d = 1.22)a | |||
Significant increase in access to services for suicidal students. | Small (d = 1.07)a | ||||
No significant increase in comfort in asking about suicide. | Small (d = 0.18)a | ||||
No significant increase in referral behaviours. | Small (d = 0.07)a | ||||
No significant increase in asking about distress. | Small (d = 0.27)a | ||||
Gatekeeper training programmes for staff and students | Â | ||||
Indelicato et al., 2011 [65] | Brief psychoeducation - QPR (Question, Persuade, Refer) gatekeeper training | Between-subjects design (no control group with 1 month and 3 month postintervention follow up) | Change knowledge | Significant increase in self-reported knowledge about suicide. | Insufficient statistics |
Significant increase in self-reported knowledge about facts on suicide prevention. | Insufficient statistics | ||||
Significant increase in self-reported knowledge about warning signs of suicide. | Insufficient statistics | ||||
Significant increase in self-reported knowledge about how to ask someone about suicide. | Insufficient statistics | ||||
Significant increase in self-reported knowledge about how to persuade someone to get help. | Insufficient statistics | ||||
Significant increase in self-reported knowledge about how to get help for someone. | Insufficient statistics | ||||
Significant increase in self-reported knowledge about information about local resources. | Insufficient statistics | ||||
Significant increase in self-reported knowledge about belief that asking about suicide is appropriate. | Insufficient statistics | ||||
Significant increase in self-reported knowledge about likelihood to ask someone about thoughts of suicide if concerned for them. | Insufficient statistics | ||||
Increase in help-seeking behaviour | Significant increase in confidence in how to respond to the situation. | Insufficient statistics | |||
Significant increase in comfort talking about suicide. | Insufficient statistics | ||||
Significant increase in effectiveness of the suicide prevention intervention. | Insufficient statistics | ||||
No significant were found regarding making a referral for help and taking the person to a mental health professional. | Insufficient statistics |