Skip to main content

Table 1 eIDSR surveillance attributes from stakeholders’ viewpoint (n = 21)

From: Electronic reporting of integrated disease surveillance and response: lessons learned from northeast, Nigeria, 2019

Attributes Frequency Yes (%)
Do users find eIDSR useful? 20 (95.2)
Do users find eIDSR simple to use? 20 (95.2)
Is eIDSR a cost-effective option for Nigeria surveillance system 20 (95.2)
Do users find eIDSR acceptable? 18 (85.7)
Is eIDSR sensitive to identify public health problems at the health facility level? 21 (100)
Is eIDSR representative of all public health problems at the health facility level? 18 (85.7)
Does eIDSR provide timely notifications? 21 (100)
Is eIDSR stable (or reliable)? 18 (85.7)
Does eIDSR provide quality data for decision-making? 20 (95.2)
Is eIDSR flexible (can other diseases be reported through it)? 19 (90.5)