Table 6 Multivariate logistic regression models on determinants of empowerment among patients with T2DM, age group: 65–75 years

Sex:

 1. men (Ref.)

1.40*

(1.06–1.85)

1.49**

(1.12–2.0)

1.47**

(1.10–1.97)

1.61**

(1.19–2.18)

1.77***

(1.29–2.42)

 2. women

Marital status

 1. single/widowed/divorced (Ref.)

1.03 ns.

(.76–1.39)

0.96 ns.

(.70–1.31)

0.94 ns

(.69–1.29)

0.78 ns

(.56–1.09)

0.75 ns

(.54–1.06)

 2. married/cohabiting

Professional education

 1. lower education (Ref.)

1.24 ns.

(.93–1.64)

1.29 ns

(.96–1.72)

1.32 ns

(.99–1.77)

1.34 ns

(.99–1.81)

1.34 ns

(.98–1.82)

 2. higher education

Person-centred care (PACIC)

1.89***

(1.56–2.29)

1.85***

(1.52–2.25)

1.45***

(1.16–1.80)

1.47***

(1.18–1.84)

Continuity of care:

 Family/regular doctor

1 = no (Ref.), 2 = yes

1.33 ns

(.97–1.82)

1.23 ns

(.88–1.71)

1.25 ns

(.89–1.75)

 Family/regular nurse

1 = no (Ref.), 2 = yes

0.95 ns

(.71–1.27)

0.86 ns

(.63–1.16)

0.92 ns

(.68–1.26)

Social support:

 Community

1.69***

(1.33–2.14)

1.45**

(1.13–1.86)

 Family and friends

1.36***

(1.14–1.62)

1.24*

(1.03–1.49)

 Peers

1.02 ns

(.89–1.16)

1.01 ns

(.87–1.16)

Diabetes-related distress

.49***

(.36–.68)

Energy/vitality

1.02***

(1.01–1.02)

Nagelkerke RSquare

n

.22

883