Table 6 Multivariate logistic regression models on determinants of empowerment among patients with T2DM, age group: 65–75 years
|
Model 1 OR (95% CI) |
Model 2 OR (95% CI) |
Model 3 OR (95% CI) |
Model 4 OR (95% CI) |
Model 5 OR (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex: | |||||
| 1. men (Ref.) |
1.40* (1.06–1.85) |
1.49** (1.12–2.0) |
1.47** (1.10–1.97) |
1.61** (1.19–2.18) |
1.77*** (1.29–2.42) |
| 2. women | |||||
| Marital status | |||||
| 1. single/widowed/divorced (Ref.) |
1.03 ns. (.76–1.39) |
0.96 ns. (.70–1.31) |
0.94 ns (.69–1.29) |
0.78 ns (.56–1.09) |
0.75 ns (.54–1.06) |
| 2. married/cohabiting | |||||
| Professional education | |||||
| 1. lower education (Ref.) |
1.24 ns. (.93–1.64) |
1.29 ns (.96–1.72) |
1.32 ns (.99–1.77) |
1.34 ns (.99–1.81) |
1.34 ns (.98–1.82) |
| 2. higher education | |||||
| Person-centred care (PACIC) |
1.89*** (1.56–2.29) |
1.85*** (1.52–2.25) |
1.45*** (1.16–1.80) |
1.47*** (1.18–1.84) | |
| Continuity of care: | |||||
|
Family/regular doctor 1 = no (Ref.), 2 = yes |
1.33 ns (.97–1.82) |
1.23 ns (.88–1.71) |
1.25 ns (.89–1.75) | ||
|
Family/regular nurse 1 = no (Ref.), 2 = yes |
0.95 ns (.71–1.27) |
0.86 ns (.63–1.16) |
0.92 ns (.68–1.26) | ||
| Social support: | |||||
| Community |
1.69*** (1.33–2.14) |
1.45** (1.13–1.86) | |||
| Family and friends |
1.36*** (1.14–1.62) |
1.24* (1.03–1.49) | |||
| Peers |
1.02 ns (.89–1.16) |
1.01 ns (.87–1.16) | |||
| Diabetes-related distress |
.49*** (.36–.68) | ||||
| Energy/vitality |
1.02*** (1.01–1.02) | ||||
|
Nagelkerke RSquare n |
.22 883 | ||||