Skip to main content

Table 6 Multivariate logistic regression models on determinants of empowerment among patients with T2DM, age group: 65–75 years

From: Empowerment among adult patients with type 2 diabetes: age differentials in relation to person-centred primary care, community resources, social support and other life-contextual circumstances

  Model 1
OR (95% CI)
Model 2
OR (95% CI)
Model 3
OR (95% CI)
Model 4
OR (95% CI)
Model 5
OR (95% CI)
Sex:
 1. men (Ref.) 1.40*
(1.06–1.85)
1.49**
(1.12–2.0)
1.47**
(1.10–1.97)
1.61**
(1.19–2.18)
1.77***
(1.29–2.42)
 2. women
Marital status
 1. single/widowed/divorced (Ref.) 1.03 ns.
(.76–1.39)
0.96 ns.
(.70–1.31)
0.94 ns
(.69–1.29)
0.78 ns
(.56–1.09)
0.75 ns
(.54–1.06)
 2. married/cohabiting
Professional education
 1. lower education (Ref.) 1.24 ns.
(.93–1.64)
1.29 ns
(.96–1.72)
1.32 ns
(.99–1.77)
1.34 ns
(.99–1.81)
1.34 ns
(.98–1.82)
 2. higher education
Person-centred care (PACIC)   1.89***
(1.56–2.29)
1.85***
(1.52–2.25)
1.45***
(1.16–1.80)
1.47***
(1.18–1.84)
Continuity of care:
 Family/regular doctor
1 = no (Ref.), 2 = yes
   1.33 ns
(.97–1.82)
1.23 ns
(.88–1.71)
1.25 ns
(.89–1.75)
 Family/regular nurse
1 = no (Ref.), 2 = yes
   0.95 ns
(.71–1.27)
0.86 ns
(.63–1.16)
0.92 ns
(.68–1.26)
Social support:
 Community     1.69***
(1.33–2.14)
1.45**
(1.13–1.86)
 Family and friends     1.36***
(1.14–1.62)
1.24*
(1.03–1.49)
 Peers     1.02 ns
(.89–1.16)
1.01 ns
(.87–1.16)
Diabetes-related distress      .49***
(.36–.68)
Energy/vitality      1.02***
(1.01–1.02)
Nagelkerke RSquare
n
     .22
883
  1. OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval; Ref.: reference group
  2. *** p ≤ .001; ** p < .01; * p < .05; ns. non-significant