Skip to main content

Table 6 Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) MetS according to tertiles (Ts) of sex-specific energy-adjusted CQI indices

From: Relationship between dietary carbohydrate quality index and metabolic syndrome among type 2 diabetes mellitus subjects: a case-control study from Ghana

CQI

T1

T2

T3

P for Trend

No. of cases/controls

53/22

6/22

3/18

 

Median

12.0

15.0

17.0

 

Range

(7.0–12.0)

(13.0–15.0)

(16.0–20)

 

OR (95% CI)

    

Model 1

1.00 (Ref)

0.11(0.04–0.32)

0.07(0.02–0.26)

< 0.001

p

 

< 0.001

< 0.001

 

Model 2

1.00 (Ref)

0.13(0.04–0.42)

0.05(0.01–0.23)

< 0.001

p

 

0.001

< 0.001

 
  1. CQI, PSR, ∑ω-3/∑ω-6, h/H, AI, TI and LI were categorized into tertiles according to the distribution of the control group
  2. For overall subjects, [CQI: T1(6.0–10.0); T2 (11.0–14.0); T3 (15.0–20.0)
  3. OR Odds ratios, CI Confidence interval, CQI Carbohydrate quality index
  4. Model 1: Adjusted for age, sex and duration of type 2 diabetes; Model 2: Further adjusted for BMI, energy, physical activity, education
  5. To test for a trend across the sex-specific energy-adjusted CQI, the median for each tertile was used as a continuous variable