Skip to main content

Table 3 Correlation between factors (demographic, knowledge, socio-cognitive) and social distancing behaviour

From: Knowledge, socio-cognitive perceptions and the practice of hand hygiene and social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study of UK university students

Factor

N

Mean (SD)

Median (IQR) a

Correlation Social Distancing Behaviour

Spearman’s rs (2-tailed) [95% BCa CI]b

p

Social distancing behaviour score

281

2.60 (0.63)

2.75 (0.5)

Age

281

23.53 (5.75)

22 (5)

0.03 [−0.09, 0.15]

0.658

Gender (F/M)

278

N/A

N/A

−0.13 [− 0.26, − 0.01]

0.026

Ethnicity (Minorities/White)

281

N/A

N/A

−0.12 [− 0.23, 0.01]

0.026

Student home/Intl status

278

N/A

N/A

−0.03 [− 0.16, 0.09]

0.573

Health course

278

N/A

N/A

0.02 [−0.10, 0.14]

0.732

Exposure

279

N/A

N/A

0.014 [−0.10, 0.11]

0.814

Knowledge – COVID-19

275

2.53 (0.75)

3.0 (1.0)

0.06 [−0.06, 0.19]

0.293

Risk perception

281

4.31 (1.56)

4.33 (2.0)

0.07 [−0.04, 0.19]

0.217

Self-efficacy – avoidance of infection

281

6.14 (1.86)

6.0 (2.0)

0.12 [0.01, 0.24]

0.047

Social distancing effectiveness knowledge

277

9.66 (0.72)

10.0 (0)

0.11 [−0.02, 0.22]

0.075

Attitudec

277

0.87 (0.95)

1.0 (1.0)

0.16 [0.05, 0.27]

0.009

 Advantages

280

4.61 (0.52)

5.00 (0.92)

0.26 [0.13, 0.38]

< 0.001

 Disadvantages (reversed) c

278

2.26 (0.81)

2.33 (1.33)

0.02 [−0.11, 0.16]

0.746

Social support

276

4.40 (0.65)

4.67 (1.0)

0.28 [0.15, 0.39]

< 0.001

Trustd

280

3.89 (0.71)

4.0 (1.0)

0.28 [0.16, 0.39]

< 0.001

Self-efficacy – social distance

280

4.39 (0.66)

4.67 (1.0)

0.43 [0.32, 0.52]

< 0.001

  1. Abbreviations: N/A not applicable, BCa CI Bias corrected accelerated confidence intervals ,SD standard deviation; IQR, interquartile range Bold: significance p < 0.05
  2. a Median (IQR) reported as based on the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for normality, variables were not normally distributed
  3. b 95% BCa CI from 1000 bootstrap samples
  4. c Cronbach α for Attitude < 0.5 so subscales (advantages and disadvantages) analysed. Cronbach α for Disadvantages subscale < 0.5 so key representative item analysed “I think I will lose my job (or have lost my job and will not be able to find other work)” – reversed - correlation with social distancing behaviour: rs = 0.09 [− 0.04, 0.21], p = 0.153
  5. d Cronbach α for Trust < 0.5, so two key items analysed “I think the decisions that have been made to reduce the spread of the novel coronavirus are fair”- correlation with social distancing behaviour: rs = 0.21 [0.10, 0.33], p = 0.001; “I think the authorities should relax the restrictions even if there are still many new cases of COVID-19 emerging” – reversed - correlation with social distancing behaviour: rs = 0.24 [0.12, 0.36], p < 0.001