Skip to main content

Table 3 Uni- and multivariate analyses of factors associated with poor/fair SRH

From: Are lifestyle factors significantly associated with self-rated health among Japanese female healthcare students?

Univariate analysis

Odds Ratio

95% CI

p-value§

Grade

 1–2

Reference

  

  ≥ 3

1.52

1.04–2.20

0.028

Living status

 Living with others

Reference

  

 Living alone

1.35

0.91–2.03

0.137

FBC

  ≥ 6 days/week

Reference

  

  < 6 days/week

1.77

1.22–2.88

0.003

Smoking

 None

Reference

  

 Past smoker

5.79

1.81–18.52

0.003

 Current smoker

4.05

0.73–22.40

0.109

Alcohol drinking

 None

Reference

  

 A few times/month

1.13

0.69–1.89

0.631

 A few times/week

1.37

0.73–2.56

0.326

 Daily

2.73

0.54–13.77

0.222

UCLA activity score

  ≥ 5 points

Reference

  

  < 5 points

1.98

1.20–3.26

0.007

AIS

 Non-insomnia group

Reference

  

 Insomnia group

5.70

3.86–8.40

< 0.0001

Physique recognition

 Want to be normal weight

Reference

  

 Want to be overweight

2.78

0.45–17.21

0.271

 Want to be underweight

0.44

0.29–0.66

< 0.0001

Multivariate analysis

 a Grade

  1–2

Reference

  

   ≥ 3

1.31

0.88–1.97

0.184

 b FBC

   ≥ 6 days/week

Reference

  

   < 6 days/week

1.32

0.87–2.00

0.191

 c Smoking

  None

Reference

  

  Past smoker

2.33

0.63–8.64

0.206

  Current smoker

2.52

0.42–14.97

0.310

 d UCLA activity score

   ≥ 5 points

Reference

  

   < 5 points

1.87

1.11–3.16

0.019

 e AIS

  Non-insomnia group

Reference

  

  Insomnia group

5.38

3.59–8.06

< 0.0001

 f Physique recognition

  Want to be normal weight

Reference

  

  Want to be overweight

3.15

0.47–21.14

0.238

  Want to be underweight

0.44

0.28–0.68

0.000

  1. §Logistic regression analysis was used. FBC frequency of breakfast consumption, UCLA University of California Los Angeles, AIS Athens Insomnia Scale, SRH self-rated health
  2. aMultivariable model was adjusted for FBC, smoking, UCLA activity score, AIS, and physique recognition
  3. bMultivariable model was adjusted for grade, smoking, UCLA activity score, AIS, and physique recognition
  4. cMultivariable model was adjusted for FBC, grade, UCLA activity score, AIS, and physique recognition
  5. dMultivariable model was adjusted for FBC, grade, smoking, AIS, and physique recognition
  6. eMultivariable model was adjusted for FBC, grade, smoking, UCLA activity score, and physique recognition
  7. fMultivariable model was adjusted for FBC, grade, smoking, UCLA activity score, and AIS