Table 10 Factors associated with feedback reports received from higher levels
From: Assessment of surveillance core and support functions regarding neglected tropical diseases in Kenya
| Â | Â | Feedback reports received from higher levels | Unadjusted Estimates | Adjusted Estimates | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Characteristic | N | No, n (%) | Yes, n (%) | OR (95% CI) | p-value | OR (95% CI) | p-value |
Health cadre | |||||||
 Nurse |  | 72 (65%) | 39 (35%) | 1.00 |  | 1.00 |  |
 Clinical Officer | 172 | 22 (56%) | 17 (44%) | 1.41 (0.64, 3.13) | 0.397 | 1.46 (0.63, 3.38) | 0.378 |
 HRMS/LS/PHS |  | 8 (36%) | 14 (64%) | 3.18 (1.52, 6.65) | 0.002 | 2.41 (1.05, 5.53) | 0.037 |
Surveillance report submission deadlines met | |||||||
 No | 172 | 27 (73%) | 10 (27%) | 1.00 |  | 1.00 |  |
 Yes |  | 75 (56%) | 60 (44%) | 2.18 (1.48, 3.23) | < 0.001 | 1.80 (1.29, 2.52) | 0.001 |
Conduct data analysis | |||||||
 No | 172 | 52 (81%) | 12 (19%) | 1.00 |  | 1.00 |  |
 Yes |  | 50 (46%) | 58 (54%) | 5.02 (2.49, 10.1) | < 0.001 | 4.55 (2.08, 9.97) | < 0.001 |