Time-efficient and computer-guided sprint interval exercise training for improving health in the workplace: a randomised mixed-methods feasibility study in office-based employees

Table 3 Task self-efficacy, enjoyment, and acceptability of the REHIT intervention

Task self-efficacy ^a	7.8 ± 1.2
Enjoyment
Enjoyment of REHIT exercise sessions^a	7.5 ± 1.5
Expected future enjoyment of REHIT exercise sessions^a	7.2 ± 1.9
Modified PACES^b	89.1 ± 16.6
Acceptability ^c
“Doing REHIT has been enjoyable”	4.4 ± 0.8
“I would recommend REHIT to others”	4.6 ± 0.5
“REHIT has been physically more demanding than I expected”	3.3 ± 1.3
“I would be happy to continue to do REHIT”	4.5 ± 0.8
“Doing REHIT has interfered with other aspects of my life due to the time commitment”	1.5 ± 0.7
“Doing REHIT has interfered with other aspects of my life due to the travelling involved”	1.8 ± 1.4
“Doing REHIT has interfered with other aspects of my life due to the physical strain”	1.6 ± 1.0
“I believe REHIT has improved my fitness”	3.7 ± 0.6
“I am pleased to have done something to improve my fitness”	4.5 ± 0.9
“I would have preferred to exercise in a group setting”	2.5 ± 1.0
“I would have preferred to exercise at home”	2.5 ± 1.1

a: scored on a scale of 1 (not at all confident/enjoyable) to 9 (extremely confident/enjoyable)
b: overall enjoyment score from 17 (not enjoyable at all) to 119 (enjoyable)
c: scored on 5-point Likert scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 3 (neither agree nor disagree) to 5 (strongly agree)

ISSN: 1471-2458