Skip to main content

Table 1 Summary of reports/studies describing the trends in incidence reports and their interpretations. (diff = difference observed, no-diff = no difference observed, age-incidence = age-stratified incidence)

From: Revisiting the epidemiology of pertussis in Canada, 1924–2015: a literature review, evidence synthesis, and modeling study

Publication

Source, year

Years of data

Place(s) of data

Type of data

Interventions discussed and conclusions

Ross [6], 1932

1880–1929

Ontario

Mortality

inter-disease (diff), male/female (no-diff), urban/rural (no-diff), age-group (diff).

Museum of Health Care [7]

1880–1934

1905–1934

Ontario

Mortality

Morbidity

The incidence data was not used in practice.

Varughese et al. [8], 1979

1924–1978

1960–1978

1969–1976

Canada

Total incidence

Age-incidence

Hospitalization

Incidence declined after vaccine introduction in 1943, as expected.

Varughese et al. [9], 1985

1924–1984

1960–1984

1980–1981

Canada

Total incidence

Age-incidence

Hospitalization

Hospitalization rates and incidence rates were almost equal, meaning that incidence reports are incomplete.

Halperin et al. [10], 1989

1985–1987

Nova Scotia

Age-incidence

The use of enhanced surveillance showed patterns of incidence similar to pre-vaccine. Whole-cell vaccine was not very effective.

Skowronski et al. [11], 2002

1981–2000

British Columbia

Age-incidence

Poor whole-cell vaccine created a cohort effect. Switch to more effective acellular changed the epidemiology. Introduction of PCR resulted in increased incidence report.

Ntezayabo et al. [12], 2003

1983–1998

Quebec

Age-incidence

Cohort effect, caused by poor whole-cell vaccine, was observed.

Galanis et al. [13], 2006

1924–2002

1988–2002

Canada

Total incidence

Age-incidence

Switch to acellular vaccine reversed observed resurgence. Cohort effect predicted caused by adolescent booster introduction. Adult booster would protect against transmission from adults to their contacts.

Vickers et al. [14], 2006

1995–2005

Saskatchewan

age-incidence

Whole cell or combined whole-cell/acellular worked better than pure acellular.

Bettinger et al. [15], 2007

1991–2004

Canada

Hospitalization

Switch from adsorbed whole-cell to acellular improved protection of small children but did not change incidence of infants.

1-dose adolescent or adult booster suggested to reinforce indirect protection to infants.

Greenberg et al. [16], 2009

1988–2004

1991–2006

Canada

age-incidence

hospitalization

Both combined DTap-Hib and adolescent/adult Tdap offered effective protection against pertussis.

Fisman et al. [17], 2011

1993–2007

Greater Toronto Area

Culture and PCR test records

Proposed a feedback model where increasing test positivity led to increased test submissions. Seasonality may be due to cough symptom interference/misdiagnosis.

Smith et al. [18], 2014

1924–2012

1980–2012

1991–2012

1991–2011

Canada

total incidence

age-incidence

hospitalization

hospitalization

The incidence trends followed expectation from vaccinations. 2012 rise was unexpected. Variations in incidence varied by province

and territory. Enhanced future monitoring was suggested.

Chambers et al. [19], 2014

1993–2013

British Columbia

age-incidence

Ratio of positive tests to overall test did not change much even in outbreaks, supposedly because of improved reporting. Improved future reporting was suggested.

Government of New Brunswick Report [20], 2014

2012

2006–2013

New Brunswick

age-incidence

region-incidence

Age groups 10-14y had the highest incidence due to waning. Booster catch-up campaigns and adolescent (any age)/adult booster for those in contacts with infants implemented/recommended.

Deeks et al. [21], 2014

2011–2013

Ontario

age-incidence for religious community/general population

Age profile of pertussis in religious under-immunized community resembled prevaccine era. Many cases in immunized 10-14y was considered a sign of waning of vaccine protection.

Liu et al. [22], 2017

2004–2015

Alberta

age-incidence

zone-incidence

Outbreaks detected based on comparison with baseline incidence in 2008 and 2012. Majority of cases had not received adequate vaccination.