Skip to main content

Table 3 Long-lasting insecticidal nets by source and household coverage strata

From: Coverage outcomes (effects), costs, cost-effectiveness, and equity of two combinations of long-lasting insecticidal net (LLIN) distribution channels in Kenya: a two-arm study under operational conditions

Study arm

Mass distribution campaign (MC)

Community Health Volunteer (CHV)

Antenatal and child health clinic (ANCC)

Social Marketing (SM)

Commercial Outlets (CO)

Othera

Total

1. LLINs

 Intervention

301 (28·1%)

550 (51·4%)

143 (13·4%)

0 (0%)

54 (5·0%)

23 (2·1%)

1071 (43·4%)

 Control

978 (70·0%)

214 (15·3%)

124 (8·9%)

10 (0·7%)

36 (2·6%)

36 (2·6%)

1398 (56·6%)

 Pooled sample

1279 (51·8%)

764 (30·9%)

267 (10·8%)

10 (0·4%)

90 (3·6%)

59 (2·4%)

2469 (100·0%)

2. Households with ≥ 1 LLIN/s from each sourceb

 a. Any LLIN

 Intervention

138 (34·2%)

241 (59·7%)

81 (20·0%)

1 (0·2%)

36 (8·9%)

n/a

404

 Control

352 (78·7%)

74 (16·6%)

81 (18·1%)

8 (1·8%)

27 (6·0%)

n/a

447c

 Pooled sample

490 (57·6%)

315 (37·0%)

162 (19·0%)

9 (1·1%)

63 (7·4%)

n/a

851

 b. ≥1 LLIN but not universal coverage

 Intervention

35 (36·1%)

49 (50·5%)

24 (24·7%)

1 (1·0%)

3 (3·1%)

n/a

97

 Control

51 (70·8%)

14 (19·4%)

14 (19·4%)

0 (0%)

3 (4·2%)

n/a

72

 Pooled sample

86 (50·9%)

63 (37·3%)

38 (22·5%)

1 (0·6%0)

6 (3·6%)

n/a

169

 c. Universal coverage

 Intervention

138 (45·0%)

192 (62·5%)

57 (18·6%)

0 (0·0%)

33 (10·7%)

n/a

307

 Control

301 (80·3%)

60 (16·0%)

67 (17·9%)

8 (2·1%)

24 (6·4%)

n/a

375

 Pooled sample

404 (59·2%)

252 (37·0%)

124 (18·2%)

8 (1·2%)

57 (8·4%)

n/a

682

  1. Underlined text indicates the channel is operating in the arm according to study design
  2. n/a Not applicable
  3. aIncludes another source (e.g. gift) or the respondent does not know the distribution channel
  4. bHouseholds can have nets from multiple sources
  5. cLLIN source for one household in this stratum missing, hence total not equal to that in Table 2