Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparison of indicators related to sexual behaviours and testing for HIV in beach boys in Galle; Integrated HIV bio-behavioural surveys carried out in 2015 and 2018

From: Beach boys in Galle, Sri Lanka: multiple HIV risk behaviours and potential for HIV bridging

 

2015

2018

X2

p-value

n/ N

% (95% CI)a

n/ N

% (95% CI)

Used condom at last sex with a casual partner

211/292

67.1 (60.2–72.8)

264/364

76.7 (72.8–80.7)

0.01

0.939

Last casual sexual partner’s HIV status unknown

179/292

60.7 (54.9–66.5)

249/366

70.6 (66.0–75.2)

3.24

0.071

Used condom at last sex with a regular partner

130/ 206

61.2 (53.2–68.3)

124/223

58.3 (51.3–65.8)

2.50

0.114

Last regular partner’s HIV status unknown

Not available

48/224

22.1 (17.4–26.9)

 

Used condom at last sex with a tourist

212/298

67.6 (61.8–73.3)

259/362

75.3 (71.3–79.4)

0.01

0.909

Used condom at last sex for which money was received

49/97

49.3 (39.1–59.1)

120/158

77.0 (70.1–83.9)

17.40

< 0.001

Used condom at last sex for which money was given

44/71

60.1 (46.7–72.8)

101/142

70.7 (60.3–80.7)

1.83

0.176

Was paid for sex at last sex with a tourist

82/290

25.6 (20.7–30.3)

93/366

24.4 (20.2–28.5)

0.67

0.410

Ever tested for HIV

28/306

10.4 (6.7–14.5)

117/336

35.3 (29.3–41.3)

60.42

p < 0.001

Discussed HIV with any sexual partner (among those who heard of HIV)

 Yes, all

8/211

3.3 (1.1–5.4)

2/249

0.4 (0–7.4)

54.52

< 0.001

 Yes, some

58/211

25.2 (19.4–30.2)

13/249

4.7 (3.0–7.1)

  

 No, none

141/211

69.3 (63.7–75.6)

215/249

85.6 (81.3–89.6)

  

 Don’t know

4/211

2.3 (0.2–4.5)

19/249

9.2 (5.7–13.1)

  
  1. Totals vary because of missing data or subgroup analysis
  2. X2 = chi-square test
  3. aWeighted population estimates and confidence intervals (CI)