Table 3 Physical component score / physical functioning as predictors of all-cause mortality
From: Quality of life and mortality in the general population: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Author (Year) | Comparison | Effect estimate (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|
SF – 36 Physical Component Score (continuous) | ||
 Chwastiak et al. 2010 [40] | HR, 1-unit increase | 0.97 (0.96–0.98) |
 DeSalvo et al. 2005 [43] | AUC | 0.73 (0.71–0.75) |
 Fan et al. 2006 [47] | AUC | 0.721 (0.708–0.733) |
 Otero-Rodriguez et al. 2010f [67] | HR, 1-unit increase | 0.952 (0.935–0.969) |
SF-36 Physical Function Scale (continuous) | ||
 De Buyser et al. 2016 a,f [41] | HR, 1-unit increase | 1.01 (0.99–1.02) |
 Mold et al. 2008 b [61] | HR, 1-unit increase | 0.98 (0.97–0.99) |
RAND-36 Physical Function Scale (continuous) | ||
 Bjorkman et al. 2019 [37] | HR, 1-unit increase | 0.988 (0.979–0.997) |
SF – 36 Physical Component Score (categorised) | ||
 Forsyth et al. 2018f [27] | HR, High vs. Low | 0.48 (0.18–1.20) e |
 Han et al. 2009 [50] | HR, Tertile 3 High vs. Tertile 1Low | 0.35 (0.19–0.64) |
 Higueras-Fresnillo et al.2018f [52] | HR, Good vs. Poor | 0.74 (0.65–0.85) |
 Myint et al. 2006f [64] | RR, Quintile 5 Highest vs. Quintile 1 Lowest | 0.47 (0.33–0.65) Men 0.41 (0.27–0.64) Women |
 St. John et al. 2018f [71] | RR, High vs. Low | 0.50 (0.38–0.64) |
SF – 36 Physical Functioning (categorised) | ||
 Lee et al. 2012f [58] | HR, Highest vs. Lowest | 0.29 (0.19–0.45) |
SF – 36 Change in Physical Component Score (categorised) | ||
 Kroenke et al. 2008 [56] | RR, Severe Decline vs. No Change | 3.32 (2.45–4.50) |
RR, Improvement vs. No Change | 0.72 (0.56–0.91) | |
SF – 20 Physical Function Scale (continuous) | ||
 Franks et al. 2003f [49] | HR, 1-point increase0.995 (0.992–0.997) | 0.995 (0.992–0.997) |
SF – 20 Physical Function Scale (categorised) | ||
 Tice et al. 2006 [74] | HR, Highest vs. Lowest | 0.70 (0.60–0.90) |
SF – 12 Physical Component Score (categorised) | ||
 Dorr et al. 2006f [45] | OR, Highest Quartile vs. Lowest Quartile | 0.16 |
 Haring et al. 2011f [51] | HR, Highest Quartile vs. Lowest Quartile | 0.56 (0.42–0.75) c 0.63 (0.47–0.84) d |
 Munoz et al. 2011 [62] | HR, 3rd Tertile vs. 1st Tertile | 0.58 (0.39–0.87) |
 UI-Haq et al. 2014f [75] | HR, Best Quintile vs. Worst Quintile | 0.36 (0.22–0.57) |