Skip to main content

Table 4 Dissaving mechanisms and social consequences for sample participants

From: Households experiencing catastrophic costs due to tuberculosis in Uganda: magnitude and cost drivers

 

Expenditure Quintilesa

 

Treatment Group

Poorest

Less Poor

Average

Less Wealthy

Wealthiest

Overall

DS

MDR

(N = 219)

(N = 229)

(N = 218)

(N = 274)

(N = 215)

(N = 1178)

(N = 1134)

(N = 44)

Dissaving Strategies

 Loan

22.8%

29.1%

27.6%

27%

25.6%

26.3%

25.9%

35.5%

 Use of savings

6%

8.6%

12%

14.1%

14.9%

11.2%

10%

39.9%

 Sale of assets

29.4%

27.6%

30.1%

25.1%

22%

26.5%

25.4%

54.4%

Any of the three above

45.5%

48.6%

54.3%

48.2%

47.6%

48.5%

47.2%

81.2%

Food insecurity

60.9%

48.6%

49.7%

50%

43.2%

49.7%

49.3%

59.7%

Divorce/separated from spouse/partner

8.7%

6.6%

10.5%

5.3%

9.2%

8%

7.8%

10.6%

Loss of Job

45.1%

44.3%

40.2%

34%

40.9%

40.5%

39.9%

56%

Child interrupted schooling

8.7%

10.7%

11%

11.6%

15.4%

11.8%

11.9%

11.5%

Social exclusion

60%

55.3%

51.4%

53.3%

50.8%

53.7%

54%

46.1%

Any days of work lost

16%

9.2%

4%

2.4%

5.7%

7.2%

4.4%

2.6%

Household received social protection after TB diagnosis

3.2%

2.9%

5.1%

4.2%

3.5%

3.9%

1.8%

56.4%

  1. a12 people excluded due to zero consumption data