Heterogeneity in the associations between common mental disorders and labour outcomes – a population study from southern Sweden

Table 2 Logistic regression (odds ratios) – The association between CMD and subsequent labour outcomes

	Non-employed Model 1 (1)	Non-employed Model 2 (2)	Sick leave Model 1 (3)	Sick leave Model 2 (4)	Disability pension Model 1 (5)	Disability pension Model 2 (6)
No CMD	Ref.	Ref.	Ref.	Ref.	Ref.	Ref.
CMD	3.74 [3.58–3.91]	3.92 [3.38–4.54]	2.84 [2.74–2.94]	1.79 [1.57–2.04]	1.31 [1.16–1.47]	2.20 [1.37–3.52]
Outcome year −1	34.15 [32.06–36.38]	34.61 [32.48–36.88]	5.74 [5.48–6.02]	5.73 [5.46–6.00]	928 [809–1066]	926 [807–1063]
Man*CMD		1.30 [1.19–1.43]		1.26 [1.17–1.36]		1.19 [0.93–1.54]
Secondary education*CMD		0.92 [0.82–1.05]		1.40 [1.26–1.55]		0.99 [0.75–1.30]
Higher education*CMD		1.15 [1.00–1.31]		1.76 [1.58–1.97]		1.15 [0.82–1.62]
30–39 years*CMD		0.85 [0.74–0.96]		1.07 [0.96–1.20]		0.56 [0.33–0.93]
40–49 years*CMD		0.85 [0.75–0.96]		1.13 [1.01–1.26]		0.51 [0.32–0.81]
50–59 years*CMD		0.71 [0.63–0.81]		1.00 [0.90–1.12]		0.59 [0.37–0.94]
Foreign born*CMD		1.18 [1.05–1.31]		0.79 [0.72–0.87]		0.83 [0.63–1.09]
n	76,608	76,608	76,608	76,608	76,608	76,608
Pseudo-R²	0.39	0.39	0.14	0.14	0.78	0.78

Note: Non-employment in November at least one of the three follow-up years. Sick leave > 14 days and disability pension at least once during the follow-up. The interaction effect (denoted by *) shows the difference in associations between CMD diagnosis and the labour outcome for the interacted group compared to the reference group, as a ratio of odds ratios. The reference groups are women, mandatory education, 20–29 years of age and born in Sweden. We control for sex, education, age-group, being foreign-born, income and year of diagnosis/inclusion in the study in all regressions. Income is measured by disposable income in the year before diagnosis and is stratified in quintiles

ISSN: 1471-2458