Skip to main content

Table 4 Intervention characteristics and study findings

From: What do we know about physical activity interventions in vocational education and training? A systematic review

Author, year

Intervention group

Control group

Period

Outcome measure

Effects and effect sizes (d)

Angerer et al., 2015 [36]

“Fit4U”: intensive nutrition counselling, sports facilities, life-skills training, and introduction of health lessons into compulsory education in VET school, provision of sports equipment during breaks;

behavior- and environment-oriented measures;

multi-behavior (PA, nutrition, life-skills training)

no intervention offered

2 years

PF: BMI, cardiopulmonary fitness

PP: sugar and fat metabolism

PsF: psychological aspects related to mental health

no significant changes

Braun et al., 2014 [37]

one hour of individually adapted circuit training with endurance and strength training components once a week;

single behavior (PA only)

compulsory physical education

1 year

PF: aerobic step test, coordination, flexibility, BMI;

PP: blood pressure, heart rate;

PsF: self-rating of physical and mental health characteristics

PF: significant increase in the number of steps (dcorr = 1.17) and duration of the step test (dcorr = 0.74)

Chen et al., 2001 [38]

Health Promotion Counselling: total of 8 h of whole group education (nutrition behavioral change, exercise behavior modifications, instruction on physiological side effects of being overweight and the benefits of weight reduction, life appreciation, interpersonal support and stress management – 2 h each), additional 12 h of small-group health promotion counselling;

multi-behavior (PA, nutrition)

no control group

1 year

PA: exercise behavior

PF: body weight, WLI

PP: blood pressure, HDL, LDL, TG, TC

PA: significant increase in PA level (d = 0.74)

PF: significant decrease in body weight (d = 0.21) and WLI (d = 0.28)

PP: significant decrease in systolic pressure (d = 0.87), HDL (d = 0.77) and TC (d = 0.26)

Hankonen et al., 2017 [39]

“Let’s Move It”: 6 h of group-based intervention for students, two 2-h training workshops for teachers to reduce their students’ sitting in class, physical choice architecture (providing PA equipment to enable light PA in classrooms);

individual and environmental changes;

participatory approach involving stakeholders in stepwise intervention development;

single behavior (PA only)

standard care, i.e., normal curriculum plus a leaflet on recommendations for youth PA

5 weeks

PA: moderate-to-vigorous PA

PF: body composition

PsF: self-reported use of behavior change technique

PsF: significant increase in use of behavior change technique (0.74 < dcorr < 0.90)

Lee et al., 2011 [40]

“SPAA-G”: original content and activity in a physical education class, plus school-based PA intervention for adolescent girls program, combining the theoretical foundation of self-efficacy theory and provision of a pedometer;

single behavior (PA only)

original content and activity in a physical education class

12 weeks

PA: aerobic step test

PF: cardiopulmonary endurance

PsF: perceived self-efficacy

PA: significant increase in the number of steps (dcorr = 0.78)

Sickinger et al., 2018 [41]

12 theoretical and practical teaching units between 65 and 90 min each on the topics of nutrition, alcohol and nicotine consumption, and PA during VET;

participatory approach involving 6 focus groups in the sensitization unit;

multi-behavior (PA, nutrition, alcohol and nicotine consumption)

no control group

11 months

PA: at least 1 h of PA per day

PsF: general self-effectiveness expectations

PsF: significant increase in general self-effectiveness expectations (d = 0.27)

Spook et al.,2016 [42]

“Balance It”: serious self-regulation game designed to target dietary intake and PA;

this tailored, interactive multimedia game could be played at any time and place desired on a daily basis, entailing a combination of behavior change techniques derived from self-regulation theory with serious game elements;

multi-behavior (PA, nutrition)

waiting list control group: no intervention between measures

4 weeks

PA: moderate PA, vigorous PA, active transport

PsF: determinants of PA

no significant changes

Verloigne et al.,2017 [43]

specific interventions were developed by a co-creation group;

several co-creation sessions during lunch break (about 50 min);

group brainstormed on what it could do to change specific behaviors and ascertain what might be relevant for the girls in their school;

co-creational approach;

single behavior (PA only)

control schools did not receive any information on PA or health outside the normal curriculum

6 months

PA: time spent in PA

PsF: self-efficacy, perceived benefits of PA, perceived barriers to be physically active

PA: significant increase in extracurricular sports participation (d = 0.19)

PsF: significant intervention effect on self-efficacy (d = 0.63)

Walter et al.,2013 [44]

aerobic endurance intervention: instructed outdoor running training twice a week;

initial duration of 30 min was increased continuously to 60 min over 10 weeks;

single behavior (PA only)

instructed not to alter their PA and exercise patterns during the control period

10 weeks

PA: mean activity intensity

PF: aerobic endurance capacity

PsF: mood state

PA: significant change in mean activity intensity (d = 0.87)

PF: significant change in aerobic endurance capacity (1.03 < d < 1.40)

  1. BMI body mass index, HDL high-density lipoprotein, LDL low-density lipoprotein, PA physical activity, PF physical fitness, PP physiological parameters, PsF psychological factors, TC total serum cholesterol, TG triglycerides, VET vocational education and training, WLI weight-for-length index