Skip to main content

Table 6 Analysis of positive 4-year change in weight status among children with overweight/obesity at inclusion (N = 169) according to variations of the VIF program locally implemented in each participating municipality (Model 1), and adjusted for sex, age, and schooling in a deprived area (Model 2)

From: Locally implemented prevention programs may reverse weight trajectories in half of children with overweight/obesity amid low child-staff ratios: results from a quasi-experimental study in France

Variables

Children

Model 1

Model 2

N (%)

OR [95% CI]

OR [95% CI]

Child Staff Ratios b

   

Variationa

School catering

ECA: HE

ECA: PA

   

V4

Low

Low

Low

19 (11.2)

3.53 [1.15–10.9]

4.32 [1.28–14.5]

V3

Low

Low

Moderate

78 (46.2)

2.00 [0.97–4.14]

3.18 [1.37–7.38]

V2

Moderate

Moderate

Moderate

22 (13.0)

1.36 [0.49–3.75]

0.93 [0.28–3.12]

V1

Moderate

None

None

50 (29.6)

 

1

Characteristics at inclusion

 

Sex

Girls

93 (55.0)

 

0.78 [0.46–1.67]

 

Boys

76 (45.0)

 

1

 

Schooled in deprived area

Yes

107 (63.3)

 

0.45 [0.20–1.02]

 

No

67 (36.7)

 

1

 

Mean age

   

1.65 [1.04–2.60]

  1. Significant results are bolded. HE = healthy eating; PA = physical activity; ECA = extracurricular activity; OR = odds ratio; CI = confidence interval
  2. a Numbered according to the city in which they were locally implemented
  3. b Classified as low if between 1 and 5 children per adult, and moderate otherwise. Based on occupation (school catering/facilitators of extracurricular activities) and training session attended (physical activity/healthy eating)