From: Occupational post-traumatic stress disorder: an updated systematic review
First author. | Year | Country | Study design | Trauma | Participants | Trauma assessment | Estimate of risk |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fitch, T | 2015 | Bangladesh | Cross-sectional | Factory building collapse | 181 survivors at 1 year post factory collapse | PCL-S ≥ 50 | (OR, 95% CI) Married (3.2, 1.3–8.0), More than 70 working hours/week (2.4, 1.1–5.3), Higher job positions (2.6, 1.2–5.6), Concussion injury (3.7, 1.4–9.8) |
James, L | 2018 | USA | Cross-sectional | Chronic exposure to critical incidents in workplace | 355 prison workers | PCL for DSM-5 | (Regression coefficients β, p-value) 1) Risk factor Being seriously injured (3.13, < 0.01), Encountering an inmate recently sexually assaulted (1.29, < 0.01), Being often placed in unnecessary danger (1.79, < 0.01), Being often unclear about what is expected of them (1.05, < 0.01). 2) Protective factor Being happy with job assignments (−1.49, < 0.01), Having positive relationships with supervisors (− 1.39, < 0.01), Having positive relationships with co-workers (− 1.46, < 0.01). |
Shah, R | 2017 | Canada | Longitudinal | Workplace traumatic event | 141 urban public transit employees | SCID-I | Factors which were significantly associated with PTSD severity (Regression coefficients β, p-value) Severity of depression (0.66, 0.01), Female (3.31, 0.02), Ethnicity (13.33, 0.01), Workplace related stress (− 0.30, 0.02). |
Geronazzo-Alman, L | 2017 | USA | Cross-sectional | Cumulative exposure to work-related traumatic events | 209 first responders | PCL-C | (Adjusted OR, 95% CI) Frequency of exposure (2.0, 1.2–3.3), Variety of exposure (2.8, 1.5–5.5), Nomothetic severity of exposure (2.9, 1.5–5.7), Idiographic severity of exposure (5.2, 2.4–11.3). |
Schenk, EJ | 2017 | China | Cross-sectional | Working after earthquake | 337 medical rescue workers who performed within the first 3 months of the event | IES-R ≥ 33 | (Adjusted OR, 95% CI) Injured during rescue work (2.7, 1.4–5.1), Experienced a water shortage (3.0, 1.4–6.6), Disconnected from family or friends during rescue work (1.7, 0.8–3.7). |
Bogaerts, S | 2013 | Netherlands | Cross-sectional | Intracolleague aggression | 174 prison workers | The Self-Rating Inventory for PTSD | Degree of type D personality (F = 21.9, p < 0.01) |
Spence Laschinger, HK | 2015 | Canada | Cross-sectional | Workplace bullying | 874 nurses (244 new graduate nurses and 630 experienced nurses) | Primary care PTSD screen | (Regression coefficients β, p-value) 1) Risk factor: workplace bullying among new graduate nurses (0.51, < 0.01), among experienced nurses (0.52, < 0.01) 2) Protective factor: psychological capital among new graduate nurses (−0.25, < 0.01) among experienced nurses (− 0.20, < 0.01) |
Taymur, I | 2014 | Turkey | Longitudinal | Industrial Explosion | 157 workers nearby the explosion building | CAPS | Factors showing significant differences using Pearson’ chi-squared test 1) After 1 month History of psychiatric disorder, physical injury, acquaintances among the dead/injured, being involved in the incident, and having seen dead people 2) After 6 months: physical injury, acquaintances among the dead/ injured, being involved in the incident |
Chatzea, VE | 2018 | Greece | Cross-sectional | Working during the European refugee crisis | 217 rescue workers | PCL-C ≥ 50 | (Adjusted OR, 95% CI) Female (2.1, 1.0–3.3), Single/divorced/widower (3.4, 2.2–4.6), Age (1.9, 1.8–2.1), Operation periods (2.1, 1.9–2.3), Duration of shifts (3.1, 2.5–3.7), Handling dead adults (2.8, 2.6–3.0), Handing dead children (2.9, 2.8–3.0). |
Diene, E | 2012 | France | Cross-sectional | Industrial factory explosion | 13,129 economically active persons in the immediate and peripheral area of industrial disaster | IES-R ≥ 33 | (Adjusted OR, 95% CI) 1) Men Employees (4.3, 2.3–7.8), Factory workers/laborers (3.7, 1.8–7.6), Temporary layoff (2.6, 1.5–4.5), Unusable workplace (1.8, 1.1–2.8), Attendance at emergency department (4.1; 2.8–6.1), < 1.7 km to explosion site (3.6, 1.6–8.1), ≥50 years old (2.8, 1.3–5.9) 2) Women Artisan (2.7, 1.3–5.7), Employees/factory workers/laborers (2.2, 1.4–3.5), Attendance at emergency department (3.0, 2.2–4.4), Reporting of an occupational accident (1.5, 1.1–2.2), < 1.7 km to explosion site (3.0, 1.2–7.3), ≥50 years old (1.9, 1.1–3.1) |
Sifaki-Pistolla, D. | 2017 | Greece | Cross-sectional | Working during the European refugee crisis | 217 rescue workers | PCL-C ≥ 50 | (Adjusted OR, 95% CI) Female (2.2, 1.1–3.4), Single/divorced/widower (3.5, 2.3–4.7), > 40 years old (3.8, 2.5–5.1), > 14 operation days (2.3, 1.4–3.2), > 4 shift hours/day (3.9, 3.1–4.7), Handling over 6 dead refugees (3.4, 2.3–4.5), Handling dead children (3.2, 1.9–4.4). |
Song, J. Y. | 2018 | Korea | Cross-sectional | Chemical release disasters | 237 workers in industrial complex | IES-R ≥ 24 | (Adjusted OR, 95% CI) Alcohol dependence (3.1, 1.3–7.6), Psychiatric symptom at the time of the accident (5.3, 1.8–15.6) Workers with high perceived stress scale scores (8.7, 2.3–33.2) |
Noda, Y. | 2018 | Japan | Cross-sectional | Working after earthquake | 220 rescue workers | IES-R ≥ 24 | (Coefficients β, p-value) 1) Higher level of education Intrusion (−0.17, 0.02) Avoidance (− 0.18, 0.03) Hyperarousal (− 0.18, 0.02) 2) Resilience Intrusion (− 0.18, 0.02) Avoidance (− 0.16, 0.02) Hyperarousal (− 0.26, < 0.01) |
McCanlies, EC. | 2014 | USA | Cross-sectional | Working after hurricane | 114 police officers | PCL-C | (Coefficients β, p-value) 1) Resilience (− 0.65, < 0.01) 2) Satisfaction with life (− 0.55, < 0.01) 3) Gratitude (− 0.67, < 0.01) 4) Post-traumatic growth (0.09, 0.55) |